Episode 319: AWAKENING

Did you notice that this show doesn't have any commercials? I'm not selling you diapers or vitamins or smoothies or gasoline. That's because I don't want corporate sponsors telling us what to investigate and what to say. Instead, you're our sponsors. This is a production by our nonprofit, the Inform Consent Action Network. If you want more investigations, more hard-hitting news, if you want the truth, go to iKindecide.org

and donate now. Good morning, good afternoon, good evening. Wherever you are out there in the world, how about we all step out onto the high wire together. We all came together last Friday. Many of you out there for a special event, the screening of Spellers. We actually toured down this entire set. We had to move the desk out of the way and make way for a

whole set of bleachers and seats so we could bring in a live studio audience because the Spellers from the movie were in studio and after the film that we broadcast live, we're able to answer questions. By the way, we're finding out that the answers to those questions and the questions that I asked are now being shared worldwide and Spellers worldwide have now been answering those questions.

At this moment, we are at over 11 million views of Spellers just from that event last Friday. So for all of you that share, this is a world-changing, life-changing documentary and this is our experience of Spellers. This is the High Wires live broadcast, the documentary Spellers. What you are about to see is a documentary that comes as close to a miracle as anything we can imagine.

There are 31 million non-spellers. There are 31 million, speakers in the world. That means 31 million people have not found their voice. They can't communicate their wants, their needs, and their show how intelligent they are. So this is just the seed of the beginning of something that needs to grow and grow. My best friend has a nonverbal child and all these kids are just brilliant beyond

words and I'm just very inspired, just moved me to tears. It was just so inspiring. My heart would burst open every single time. I saw the parents' expression the first time they communicated with her child. My son is six, he's non-speaking and I heard about the movie and I got a text that said they were doing the premiere here today and I dropped everything I was

doing and decided to come out because I just feel like I needed to be here to learn. We have a six-year-old son, Tuck, who is nonverbal and it's really autistic. Seeing them actually do it, they were intellectually answering every question. Me and my wife were just like bawling. We can't wait to go home and continue training with him. Let him know that we know he's able

and our hope is just totally renewed that we could talk to Tuck one day and I can't really put it in words. It's amazing. We have a friend who has a son who's nonverbal. What advice they have for parents, slash families of younger children just starting out on this journey of spelling. Son is strong, you should expect him to soak up information and spell each day

for short sessions, he will surprise you. One thing that struck me was how different each individual was. The humor that came out and the depth and the eloquence and also just the desire to help others. It's really so beautiful to see. I just want to know how you learned how to read, is it watching television, was it newspapers or how? Elizabeth type, the CNN ticker. Wow.

Being in the live audience, actually being here watching in real time for anybody who's doubting, I would just say it's obvious that these spellers are doing the work. When I asked how young should we be doing this? Because people are saying, well, you shouldn't say that. I started too early because these kids can't spell. I know these kids can spell. I know these kids can read.

I see it in my office. You have an eight, nine year old, they're reading. So if they can spell, they can do this. Right? The rest is just motor skills. It's learning how to ride a bike. It's learning how to do any other skill. At what age should I as a practitioner be sort of pushing this? I started at five and could have done it earlier.

Wow. I think a lot of kids are trapped and they're not able to say what they want to say and not able to communicate as much as they should be able to. So I think it's very important for kids to be able to say exactly how they're feeling and be able to type it out. Presumed competence always, and know that our bodies don't always listen to

us. I just love that these kids finally have a voice and we're able to really know what they're thinking and how they're feeling and just to be able to get that out is just as numerical. Somebody's going to watch this one day who thinks they're son or or daughter can't do it, which is what I felt like an hour and a half ago. And now like,

I just want to get home. I'm happy though. It just gives me even more hope that my son's like way smarter than I give him the capability of that one day he will be able to tell us how he feels. Believe in all non-speakers and presumed competence always. Our brains and bodies don't cooperate and we are intelligent. Everybody needs to see this movie, every ABA therapy.

Every specialist, every speech therapist, every educator needs to see this movie. Elizabeth type. Help is on the way. Communication for all will be a reality. The blind, have braille and the deaf sign language. All non-speakers will spell and type. Well, if you didn't have the opportunity to join us, Spellers is a revolution. It's going to sweep the world. The high wire is really. We're just so

excited to be a part of launching this incredible movement into the stratosphere. You know, this idea of these, you know, non-speakers finding their voice really and, you know, all of them that joined us, their families, was just an incredible experience. This documentary and this idea, just imagine being 18, 20 years old, and everyone thinks you have no ability to communicate. Maybe you have a first grade

reading level. They don't know. And suddenly somebody figures out a way for you to communicate. And it turns out that you have at least a college level mind. Many of these kids within a year are studying calculus. Going through college, this is truly an outstanding story. And so it is going to be live on our website all the way till midnight to night. Remember, it's not

just a film. You get this opportunity to see the Spellers in action as we ask them questions in the Q&A afterwards. So if you want to be a part of this launch out of the high wire and get this far and wide, you have to midnight to be a part of that. And of course, Spellers will be making its rounds after that in the months and

years to come, I'm sure. But we were just happy to be a part of that experience. And, you know, so speaking of experiences and being a part of, you know, this film process, this creative process, and you know, part of what has been so important to me through the years is, you know, bringing humanity in the heart and soul and the feeling about these conversations that

we've been afraid to touch on. The high wire, you know, started out in the space of vaccines and, you know, the investigation of the medical establishment. But as you've been watching, it's opening up to a much bigger issue that's out there. We're starting to talk about central reserve banking system. What if they go to crypto? What's going to happen there? AI, issues happening in our schools,

our families being torn apart by laws that are giving our, you know, children, educations, we're not happy about. All of that is a part of this movement. And this movement has been documented in a way like no other. What I'm talking about is the series of pandemic movies. It started with pandemic one, then, pandemic two took it to another level. And we are happy to be

premiering plans. And pandemic three or more importantly, the great awakening. This is the new film by Mickey Willis. And we have the hot new trailer off the presses. He rented in by hand just minutes ago. Take a look at this. This is a global pandemic. Banny, unvaccinated people from all but the most essential businesses. We will shut you down. We'll have to be things that will

essentially put pressure on them. We will cite you. Don't think you can get on a plane or a train. And we will take you to jail. So it's a pretty good incentive. Or we will keep you in a facility longer. As the world was descending into synchronized tyranny, I began to ask myself. Oh, it feels so good. I know. How did they get everyone to go

along with this? Obsessed with finding the answer, I began studying every moment in recorded history where masses of people acted against their own self-enters. F**king f**king freedom. I want my freedom to live. Screw your freedom. You're a schmuck. You are right now with an economy in crisis, but with an incredible opportunity. Unprecedented opportunity for a reset. Your oil eyedness is distinguished heads of state and government.

It's a future spilt by us. We need a great reset. When they say you'll be happy, what they mean is you'll be enslaved. There are forces using fear and isolations to induce mass psychosis. You probably assume you're safe. That could be a deadly mistake. Raising refood shortages. I don't want you to be hopeful. Fire mental bill fires. I want you to panic. Storms. It will kill

your children. I want you to feel the fear. I feel everyday. When people are afraid, they won't just accept authoritarianism. They'll demand yesterday. I asked chat GPT. Are there any similarities between today's woke revolution and chairman Mao's culture revolution of the 1960s and it wrote back how long do you have? He used young people to start cultural revolution. The only mechanism that could explain what was

happening in society was what is usually referred to as mass formation. Anyone that goes against this collective mind, you gotta get rid of them. You gotta dispose of them. And they do so as if it is a nitty-gritty to do so. That what makes the process so dangerous. The question is how are we going to deprogram these people? A lot of people need to be deprogrammed

right now. They have two types of America. Those who are vaccinated and those who are not. Clean and unclean. We can't trust the unvaccinated slave passports. It's going to be very hard for people unless they can prove their vaccination status. Atomic camps. Students at Harvard now want to set up re-education camps. It's the new segregation. Today we have the technology to have human beings on a

massive scale. The masks are so strong technologies. Those who control the data control the future not just of humanity but the future of life itself. People are starting to wake up across the world. I'm seeing people come together from our walks of life. Finally saying enough is enough. We didn't come here for no reason. We have a voice. We're here to share. This is not political.

This is about globalization. It's about human rights violations. We have to be the solution. We cannot rely on the media, the president or whoever. To fix these problems. We need to get away from asking others to solve our problems. We have to have a say and it has to be listened to. Our voices matter. Open your eyes. We're all being driven back to the dream. As

you see in the audience, Democrats, Republicans, White, Black, everyone ought to be between. This is the example that they do not want to see but they have no choice. The masses of humanity have been slapped awake. It's time to wake up. People cannot go back into the matrix now. A lot of people are trying to. They can't. Well, if you're not down with the great reset,

then you better get ready for the great awakening. I'm joined now by Mickey Willis. Wow. I'm just a trailer. I'm pumped. Thank you. Thank you. I'm excited, Mickey. Let's just take it back just for a minute because we have a brand new audience every week now that are waking up to everything that's gone on around them. I remember I first met you in California when I

was making Vax. Remember you came around. I think it was popped through Ohio and said, look, you need any help with your film or anything. I'm here and we stayed in touch. Then I remember, Vax came out. I had that whole ride. I think up into the moment, I think Vax really was holding his position. It's probably the most censored film in history. We were kicked

out of Tribeca Film Festival. We were being censored everywhere. We were going. And then, a pandemic, a billion views but not without just absolute crushing censorship, your websites being taken down all of it. From there in this journey, then, a pandemic too, what has this experience been for you? What can we expect now? I mean, I know part of the conversation is, is this what we've

been calling this pandemic? Well, it is part of the series, but it's really spotlighting what the pandemic was used to accelerate. And so it's not about vaccines, but as they have always said, never let a good crisis go to waste. And so this crisis, whether it was naturally occurring or intentionally created and released, which I kind of leaned towards that, it was leveraged to forward a

decades-old agenda, if not a hundred years old or so, agenda to undermine and subvert the United States. Because the United States is a firewall for a globalized agenda to centralize everything. And now we're... This is a conversation that I don't think many people were willing to even listen to just a couple years ago. There were a lot of this that we wanted to put into a

pandemic too, but I just thought, you know, I don't know if people are ready to hear this yet. And now everyone is talking about it. Because they're seeing it. So it's been accelerated so much that it's in our face. And when we talked about digital implants or passports, people just thought that was a crazy conspiracy theory. Now they're at Davos, part of the World Economic Forum,

talking about that technology is almost ready. And the CBCs and the central bank currencies and all that, which you mentioned in your intro, that's the beginning of the end. That is literally a point when they control, as many of the world dictators have said, when they control the food, when they control the currencies, when they control the power supplies, they control all humanity. And it's hard

for people like myself who want to believe that the world is full of just benevolent spirit, to come to terms with the fact that there are people that are literally have been so divorced from their own nature, from humanity itself. And they carry such a wound for whatever happened to them or whatever deficiencies occur. They've heard in their life through bad parenting or through being rejected

from society, whatever it might be, that they have carried these wounds into their business, their globalized business in such a way that it literally has the potential to destroy everything. And that is part of the agenda, is really that when you talk about the great reset, what does the great reset really mean? It sounds interesting to a lot of people. Because we all recognize that we're

in a system that doesn't serve everyone. And it's broken in many ways. So a reset feels refreshing. This whole thing needs a reset. But what they really mean by that is the tearing down of Western civilization. So everything that makes this country unique, everything that makes this country the destination for all immigration anywhere in the world. If America was what the media says it is, it's

a systemically racist and horrible and bigoted and all these things. Why are all of the immigrants rushing to this nation for survival and for protection? Because there's something special here of this country that was built upon an agreement, a mission statement, a constitution that honors and protects the individual. But it's been subverted to believe that it's a democracy. And the democracy, that thing that you see

all the news, that's one of the unintended consequences and beauties of this situation, is truth was difficult to find before. It's so easy now. All you have to do is tune in the mainstream media. Whatever they're parroting on loop is the lie. So all you hear is, you know, a threat to our democracy. They try to amplify that because democracy itself turns into mob rules. And

so at the very same group that is talking about protecting minorities are pushing a system that only supports the majority. That's what democracy is. If you're 51% of the power, then the minority gets shut out. But a true constitutional republic means the majority protects the individual. And the individual is what has been lost. That individual, that thing that you and I were both, you know, through

the Hollywood system. We were both lured into believing that you don't take care of yourself first. You take care of everyone else and then you eat the crumbs that are left over. And there's a reason that they say on an airplane when the mask comes down, put it on first before you try to help anyone else. And there's no good to the world and to each

other if we ourselves are not taking care of ourselves. Yeah, you know, it's funny. You bring up Hollywood. I really grapple with this. We both come out of Hollywood and work there. And, you know, I've talked about just my politics around this. You know, I remember, you know, we first come out. I'm just like, Oh, you know, this whole liberal agenda or whatever it was. It's

changed. But when you really start looking, I start looking back at my past, how I sort of saw the world. I would say that the major, the thing that, the thing that, when I thought about politics, it shouldn't be about politics. It's about humanity, right? When we look at these politics right now, I remember thinking, well, you know, I'm a Democrat because therefore the people and,

you know, Republicans are for the corporations. Remember saying things like that. But now when I look back, I would say that I would say a central tenant is, you know, that I now recognize and I hear it. My family members and friends around me that are still sort of trying to pride themselves out of the thinking. I'm sure of it is human beings are a disease

on this planet. You just nailed it. And literally a lot of my favorite movies, Matrix and all these movies, if you, if they have a narrative within them, that is about this parasitic. Yeah. The humans are a cancer on the planet. And these narratives were planted long ago because when you look at the pillars that support our society and a lot of the working thriving societies

in the world, there's a foundation of a connection with creator. There's a respect for nature itself. And the real move is transhumanism. It is to synthesize everything, to digitize everything in such a way that we no longer are honoring. And if you just look at the magnificence of this life we get to experience, the fact that our planet grows food in primary colors that are for

the exact organs of your in your body. You crack open a carrot and you look at it, it looks like the iris of an eye. And it's eye food. Yeah. It's a dark open a walnut, it's a mini brain, two hemispheres, and it's brain food. Right. Like our planet has provided everything. But, systemically, we've been guided away from the beauty and brilliance and perfection of nature.

Yeah. So that we start to worship something synthetic. Well, we're starting to say all that's an accident. Not at all. A giant accident. Yes. A giant accident. And science is here to fix the, the mistakes that nature has made. That's where the whole vaccine thing comes in. What people don't realize is you look at it. They want to vaccinate us for the millions and billions of

viruses of bacteria walking the plant. They have this idea that we can do this better. Even though that's what your immune system is doing every day. Right. It's already doing it. You were already perfectly designed. We could have looked at the couple of people that are having some issues. You know, somehow their immune system got down. You know, they were in trouble. But you look at

things like measles. It was, you know, the death rate of like one and a half a million before a vaccine ever came along. And now, but they rewrite that history. They're rewriting our history that we have. We had these systems that everything sort of works in balance with nature. Now there's no such thing as nature. Now there's not even my, my, my gender is not even

decided by nature. It's decided by a doctor. That's between me and a doctor and the doctor. And I get to decide, you know, what I'm walking on this planet. I mean, and to me, it really is. I mean, whether we call it God or source, you know, people get triggered. And again, what is the triggering? But we've been taught to be triggered by these ideas that

there's something bigger than ourselves. That's connecting us. Well, I tell you, I, the series of plannedemic has really brought me closer to that source. It really has. Because I was, I was born and raised without religion and, and really without any kind of religious input. And I'm grateful for that because I got to find it on my own. Yeah. But through working with so many truly

brave people that are in authentic service to humanity, I found that the one thing they have in common is that they all have a connection with God. And the, on the flip side, as we've done a deep dive on all of the major players that are behind this destructive agenda to destroy our lives, to decrease the population, whatever it might be, every single one of them

so far as we look into their private life are atheists. And so there's something to be said about that. When you lose the touch with, with that connection with source. And again, by whatever name you choose to call it, when you lose that connection, that's where these ideologies. That's where now you can have a generation of, of young people thinking God is so fallible that I

would, I've been put in the wrong body. I want to, I belong in that body over there. And you can only have those thoughts and have that dysphoria. If you lose the connection with the divinity and the perfection of, and the brilliance of nature itself. And that is what, what man has, what has happened to us is that we have, our, our natural systems have been

so disrupted that there are people now who do need synthetic remedies to survive. Yeah. Because they, their system wasn't honored. And so for me, it's, it's the real awakening, the great awakening is understanding that we have a choice right now. And, and, and I mean that literally we have the choice. The people have the choice. And if there's any message that I want to convey to

the, the American people and people around the world, it is stop waiting for you for me and for any other charismatic leader to come along and say the day that will never happen. We've been lulled into this, you know, voting for the lesser of two evils and thinking that this person is closest to what we believe. And so that's going to, they're going to come in

and fix it. It will never happen. What will happen and what will ensure our victory in the situation is when everyone watching this program right now. Regardless of what you have in the bank, regardless of your education level, regardless of your, of your resources or whatever you think might limit you. Stepping up to understand that we are in the human organism, everything else has been a

distraction, race, sexism, all the stuff is a distraction. To keep us from remembering that we are all cells within the organism of humanity. And when those cells are disagreeing or even just complacent, just clump together and not functioning, we have disease. So when these cells light up with the impulse that they were born to be activated in the body, we have to be able to, which

is life to help life evolve. When we come back into the remembrance of that original code that inspired us to even inhabit these bodies, then this whole game changes as fast as it's being destroyed right now, our country in our world. We correct the problem and we fix it together. And so that's the message of the pandemic three of the great awakening. It's one of the

many messages, but it's the message that I hope people take away from. What are you going to do? What are the people that see themselves as the audience? We've been convinced that we are consumers. That's what they call us on the media, consumers. And we're not. Consumption is taking. We're creators. We're here to give. So what are you here to give? That's my question to the

people. Yeah, and I think we're all, you know, those of us that have, you know, been blessed with, you know, ability to make media to get to people. But as I've been speaking this last year, when I'm in public, I'm really, I'm working hard to shift this thought. And that is, you know, when people come up and they want to, you know, say, thank you so

much for what you do. And, you know, and, you know, we wouldn't be, you know, you're changing the world. I'm like, I'm really not. I mean, I'm really not. I'm standing on a stage. I'm one person. You know, I have a great team around me. We're getting through it. That's sure we've got a decent legal team. But changing the world is the thousand of you here.

Going out and saying, whatever it is, whatever it is you do. And then when people ask me, you know, what am I supposed to do is, though, somehow, you know, I've got an idea of what, you know, it's out. As though there's some sort of cookie cutter, one thing I could tell you. And I keep trying to say, you are the very same thing. You were

a cell in a body. You may be a heart cell or a brain cell or a leg cell or a toe. Say whatever it is. But if you don't do your job, this entire thing comes crashing down. And you've got to reach inside yourself right now and recognize. You were here for a purpose. And what I believe is the most critical, important moment in the history

of mankind. We are literally staring, you know, at the precipice. We're looking at a force of AI and and technocracy that rips in, well, tear apart anything that is natural wants to. It's devouring it as we speak, coming at us. We're either going to win or lose this battle. And what I think is awesome in our lifetime. We're going to see it. What keeps people, what

I've discovered for the narrative of the Great Awakening is what's interesting is what keeps good people from getting out in the world and being activated to do good things is actually something benevolent. And that is we have fallen into a category called collectivism. And and we're all, you know, we're in this together, right? That was the narrative of of COVID. We're in this together. Do this.

Don't do this for you. Do this for others. You're here to protect others. You may be vaccinated. You may be infected by the mask and tripled mask but still keep getting shots for other people. Somehow. That idea is is what's at the root of the immobility of the people. Because we care. Everything that has had the people do good people do bad things is literally because

they're compassionate. It's weaponized compassion. Because we care, I know that I was on the frontline of so many battles as an activist for 20 years. And I look back at them and I realize now they have the because I cared so much. I wanted to help women and minorities and all of that. And I'm on the frontline. Now I understand I was literally fighting for the

very forces that I thought we were resisting. And so one of the main issues with collectivism is you're bonded by agreement. And so you have to agree with your tribe to stay connected. So the beauty of that is to realize that the intrinsic most primal desire for people is to be connected. So much that people will let the world be destroyed around them. If that means

staying in good grace with my tribe. But we have to realize. I got to sign off yesterday. It was okay to do nothing. That's right. That's right. But what we have to realize is that kind of bond is false. It's not built on love. It's built on fear. Because now I'm fearful that the moment I disagree with you, the moment I go, I'm okay with people

transitioning if they choose a transition. But I'm kind of not okay with ruining female sports. So I disagree just with this. You're out. It's over. There's a checklist of like you have to agree with all of this. So it's a very fragile relationship that you have with your collective. True relationship is independence. True relationship is you believe what you believe. I believe what I believe but

we're connected by spirit. We're connected because we're humans and I love you regardless. That's a true friendship. So for the people that are afraid of being misplanned online or attacked or losing your tribe, lose them. Be willing to lose them. Speak your truth. Because what shows and Dell and I are a testament to this. I know because we've talked about this a lot. A lot of

people in our lives that we thought were our friends went away. But the new crowd that showed up, I feel love me for me. Not because I agree with them, but they love me. And there's nothing better and more than that feeling of security to know my community of friends. Have my back regardless of what I say and do. They just love me. And that's what

people need to come back to is drop the bonds, you know, being bonded by agreement and just come back into being truthful. And those who resonate with truth will be attracted to you. And then you can live a life of truth and not a mass grade. What do we say to you? You know, as we are seeing people waking up, then you know, you start to

see these petty arguments still breaking out. Right? Well, I was anti-vax with you. I was just COVID-vax, you're full of vax, you're, you know, there is no virus there. And we're just, we so quickly, how do you describe how we so quickly, we come together, you know, we stand for something, we stand out, we know we're not. We sort of find this group and then we

fraction off and go off and then get polarized again. And I would want to blame media, but is it a part of our nature? It's a long answer, but I'll try to, I'll try to convince what I believe is. I'm too much of a nut to show. I'm just trying to figure this out. I have to. Yeah. And here's what I believe. It's interesting, because when

I remember starting to first studies Bible philosophies and I heard the name of God as I am that I am. I went, yeah, so weird. What does that mean? I believe that somewhere within our, our spiritual existence, that we, when we existed as one, truly as one, this one consciousness, and then we decided to play this game of individuality. There was almost like a code that

was planted of I am not that. So we're constantly looking for where we disagree so that we can have this experience of, of believing that we are individual, because the moment we say I am that, I am that, I am. Yeah. Then we're connected again. And I think this is the moment that that game of separation that we decided to play together, I think we're tired

of it. Yeah. I think the game has gotten old enough to where we have to come back and remember that I am that, I am. And, and then we'll stop looking for where we disagree. We agree all the time. And, and on another note, that is, is, is, if, if people go to Plandemic3.com or PlandemicSeries.com and search out a short film called Our Birthright. It went

viral a few months ago. It was my message to the world of exactly what you just brought up. This, this, this tendency for us to suddenly pray somebody as an incredible voice and the moment they say something that we don't agree with then we trash them. And the whole world piles on them and they say, yeah. And then we get rid of them. Some of this

is, is a psychological operation that's planted by these devious people behind these agendas where they, they, they want us all fighting. It's the reason that I was raised with a gay brother. He was already out by the time I was born. So I was kind of, it was normalized for me when I came in that my brother has boyfriend and girlfriend sometimes. It was, it was

an easy thing for me to accept as a child. Then it was, it was the gay community. Then it was gay and lesbian community, gay and bisexual lesbian community. LGBTQI, you know, the acronym is ridiculous at this point. It's such an incredible. We have enough acronyms eventually. Everyone's that's right. So now all the feminist are now fighting a transgender movement and all the people just want

to live their life with their same sex lover are fighting against. And that's the, the, the slices and diocese into all these subcategories so that we're vax, unvaxed, you know, germ theory, whatever theory. And, and we have to be careful of that tactic. And just I always say is the person moving in the right direction. I don't care if everything they say is perfectly, perfectly accurate.

I'm friends with Alex Jones and I think some, I told him on the, I think some stuff you say is bonkers crazy. You know, and he said, so do I. But at the same time, I can appreciate you as a human being what you've been fighting for long before I have. And I also, I mean, and this is the same thing. And of course I have

haters. Some of them are watching right now. I'm sure. And with Alex Jones, I mean, what I see in Alex Jones, because it's a good example, right? Because that's in, when people look at us, they like make this comparison. Like you're on a show in blah, blah. And I said, Alex Jones, he's on here. You are doing a show every day for four hours straight. And

you're planting a flag and everything that you think might be wrong in the world. It's not all going to be wrong. And some of you can be, you know, you're going to be wrong about, but you make it as look at it. And that's the job that he sees he has. Whereas I have a job where I see, I'm it's more important to me that the

flags I choose, the things that I'm really going to go after that I'm perfectly well researched. That is nailed to the wall. So if someone comes in and they really look at the work we're doing, they can say, Hey, man, they're like almost 100% accurate. Takes more time. I only do a show once a week. That's what I'm guided to do. You're guided to make a

film. And in all of this, there's people that will, why aren't you fighting this fight? Tell her why don't you stay in for that? Well, because I'm not guided to. I'm not guided to be Alex Jones. And I'm not guided to be Mickey Willis. I'm Dell Beatre. I have lawsuits. I'm winning. I've got things that like we got to groove on and we, you know, is

my one approach the one that's going to save the entire, no, it's going to take all of us. It's like a good sports metaphor. You're on a baseball team and everyone's saying, why aren't you playing catcher? Right. Because we need other bases covered. There's a team here. We have a function. You do your thing. Exactly. You do your thing and let's play, let's play together. Yeah.

It's amazing. How many people are screaming at me that you know, I should be pitching. Yeah. I'm just, no, I'm really good shortstop. Didn't spend my time there. Sorry. But if you got that nail it, you know, maybe you get to, you know, go all the way to the big game. Let me ask the hardest, I think the hardest question ball. Because I know you and

I, we, we will sit at night sometimes when you're not editing like you are like crazy right now. But really it's this conversation of I talk about it inside my family. My dad was sort of the spiritual, you know, guru guy and Boulder, Colorado and would always meditate and everything. My mom's like the Mohawk warriors. She's a fighter. And I remember my dad would always say

to my mom, Norma, you know, you keep fighting everything, but you're just feeding what you're fighting. You got it back out. You just got to find a place to love. You know, I really grappled with that as I got into this sort of vaccine. You should have seen these children being maimed and destroyed and now adults. And, and I'm sure, you know, as we look at

it, you and I both know we've got to recognize our connection. As you said, I'm that. I am that person that's across from me. But how do we, how do we recognize that there's an issue? Yeah. And that by definition says you're an enemy. And I have to fight that. How do we fight the other cells in our body? Yeah. Yet move towards stasis and beauty

and connection. Because my, you know, if my dad was right, I feel like if I honestly feel like if I just stepped away right now in the high wire and stopped the work that we're doing exposing these issues, I think we all go about sleeping. We're dead. Yeah. So what is that balance in understanding what you're up against, having compassion for it, not feeding it, but

giving life to something better? Yeah. It's, it is one of the biggest challenges because people have asked me a lot. We, we spend hours a day in the edit bay and we look at all the dirtiest media that is provided from around the world. I mean, we have terabytes filled with everything that Taliban has done and whatever. And we have to look at this stuff all

day long. And so the question is always, how do I look at it without becoming totally desensitized, where it doesn't matter anymore? And how do I look at it where it doesn't destroy me? Or where I don't become the very thing that we're fighting, because I become so bitter and so angry. Right. And so it really does require a, again, when we're in a, in a

place of sovereignty, where we realize self care is number one before my children, before my wife, all of it. And they're incredibly important to me. But daddy takes care of daddy first, right? Not in a selfish way, in a way of my responsibility to my family is taking care of me first. And so we have developed, you know, just, we've gotten clear with like, look, this

is a tough day. We're having a tough day what we're looking at today. And I might need to go in the backyard and take off my shoes and get in the grass, whatever it might be. But it's, it's, it's so critical that we don't look away from reality, that we are willing to look at in the eyes, this dragon that we're here to slay. And, and

that we don't become the, the very energies that we're seeking to dissolve in the world. And it takes some inner awareness. It takes us to slow down, which is why our world is designed right now to keep us so damn busy that, you know, I can't go to the, into the bathroom anymore without my cell phone. It's like I, I feel like something's missing. Right. I

know I'm not alone. It's a downtime. Right. Right. Right. Now, downtime. I need to be doing this. Right. Instead of just nothing. Right. And so it, it is required of us to come back to that ex of stepping out of being a human doing and be a human being again. So we're just being. I just go be with my kids without an agenda, without a, you

know, I'm trying to get them ready to go do something. And we've got us, we've got a game coming up. But just how are you? What's going on in your world right now? Being present. The more we can balance out the busyness of our distracted existence with presence. Because truly at the end of the day, Dell, and I discovered this from being a father and interviewing

so many people's far more intelligent than I'll ever be, is at the end of the day, our greatest gift to give each other's presence. Pure presence, not presence with a bunch of cognitive busyness going on. I'm trying to get something from you or make you like me or achieve something, no agenda, but just human to human. How are you, my brother? And can we be present?

To Dell the human, not Dell the host of the high wire or any of that. How do we come back into giving the gift of presence to our children, to our spouses, to our friends and neighbors. Stop every now and then. I've been working on that. I'm in the backyard. I have an elderly couple behind us and I can see them. And I've always seen them.

They're out watering the lawn. And this lately I thought, you know, hi. Hey, what's going on? Yeah. Hi, you want some eggs or chickens just laid eggs? Okay, great. Let's connect again. Yeah. Let's come back into that. You're my neighbor. Yeah. We don't just live next to each other. We're neighbors. We're in a community together. Yeah. And the just that slide a show of presence to

this elderly couple. They just light up. Yeah. They just light up. And so more of that. Yeah. More of that is what I recommend. Yeah. I think and I agree with you. It's time to fall in love with each other again with people again. And then I think you start recognizing whatever is trying to tell us if I'm not allowed to love my neighbor. Yeah. There's

something I'm supposed to hate in them. That's what I should probably start pushing away from my life and stay focused in here. I think that's what we're trying to do here. I really can't wait for the great awakening. I mean, it looks like, you know, and peeking in here and there and watching this process. Man, I mean, it's you're about to bring it. You're about to

make us look at it, aren't you? Well, we're doing our best. I'm going to be a guest, Del. And I will say to you that, you know, three years later after the release, we just celebrated May 4th, the three year release from the pandemic one. And it was a really bitter, sweet experience for me to be perfectly transparent with you. Because on one hand, we got

to go, wow, three years later and 100% of every claim we made in both movies are 100% accurate. And the world is waking up to it right now. Yeah. And part of me as my crew is celebrating, I'm sitting back wishing I wish I were wrong. I really do. It's so fun to be right. I mean, there's a natural tendency for us. We love to be

right. Yeah. But in these cases, I wish I were wrong. And I wish that the stuff is going to be conveyed in the great awakening. I wish I were wrong. I know I'm not. And but people need to wake up to what's really going on. Because it's affecting all of our lives and the people that are hiding because they don't want to lose their job or

disrupt whatever. All of that is is an under threat anyway. But I'm not a doom and gloom guy. I may this is what's real. Yeah. We need to look at what is actually subverting our lives, our liberties in our future. And the ownership of everything, there's a major movement right now. You'll own nothing and be happy as the slogan right. But it's like it literally is

the communist tactic of all private property is owned by the state. But the upside to this is and how we end the movie is showing the victories. Like spotlighting the Dutch farmers who were terrorized. And they fought back peacefully. They they use the leverage of their communities of their intelligence and they won and they beat that system for now. Yeah. That that will come back. Yeah.

If they go back to sleep. Yeah. But all around the world, incredible things are happening. And they're led by mama bears and Papa bears and ordinary people who just had enough. Yeah. And so we're going to spotlight all the ways that we can participate in this awakening because we are the awakening. Yeah. Like the people are the awakening. Yeah. And the moment we accept that, then

we come out of the nightmare and we await to the beauty of and the perfection of this existence. Fantastic. All right, man. Mickey Willis everybody out there. June 3rd. We are premiering the great awakening here on the high wire. What you want to do is you want to get your email in. You want to register so that you're inside the movie theater that this will be

played on the best way to do that is go to plan. Demick 3.com. It gives you the ability to register and sign in there. Once you're signed in, you will be allowed access when this thing goes live. There's an undisclosed location where we're going to be going live with the actual screening. So there's going to be a red carpet. I'm going to be with Tracy Beans.

We're going to be talking to all of the celebrities and people that are a part of making all this happen. So it's going to be a lot of fun. But really set the calendar. This is this is an opportunity. I mean, think about what we're doing. We got to play with this a little bit with Spellers last week. Over 11 million of you were a part

of viewing this thing over the week together. I think, you know, probably a million right at the same time. What we want to do is can you imagine if a billion people across the world are signed up to have this experience together. We want to see what that experiment feels like. What if we are all sitting together in this moment and thinking about how together we're

going to change this world staring right in the eyes of what this is all really about. This is what the great awakening is. And we're going to put on one of the biggest social experiments that's ever been. So go to plan. Demick 3.com right now register in get your friends to register in. We're going to do something we're doing it without Hollywood. We're doing it without

the studios. We're going to show them. This is the way we can change the world. The more people that are signed up the more they see do this. The more they will realize their days are numbered. And maybe they'll just step out of the way and let us make the world a better place. Mickey, thank you for all your incredible work. Thank you for everything. Really

looking forward to it. Likewise. All right. Great. Well, it's time for the Jackson Report. All right, Jeffrey. What do we got this week? I mean, every week I love the fact that we just get to stare the man in the face, point it out, and then so many victories. I mean so much as people are looking at what we're talking about. There's starting to contact their

representatives. We're seeing representatives starting to talk about the things that we are, you know, that we're seeing. And so there does be like the ship going on, but it is important to put our eyes on it. So what are we putting our eyes on this week? Yeah. So over the years here at the highway, we have reported on the exiting the stepping down of three previous

CDC directors. And we're about to add to that tally as Ryszelle Walensky has announced she is stepping down. She'll be out in June. And arguably she's she's presided as director of the CDC during the time of the largest loss of public trust and integrity in that agency. Yeah. And this is what the news is reporting on. Take a look. All right. CDC director Dr. Ryszelle Walensky

announced today that she's stepping down. Director of the CDC announced today she's resigning in a letter to President Biden. She did express mixed feelings about her decision and did not provide an exact reason. Saint the nation is in transition. As COVID emergency declarations are ending. She headed the agency for just over two years and says as the COVID-19 pandemic wanes now is a good time to

make a transition. Well, enski helped oversee the Biden administration's COVID response as the nation emerged from lockdowns. Lenski is an infectious disease expert who had never headed a government agency. When the president brought her into restore confidence in the CDC, the agency has more than 12,000 employees at a budget of $12 billion a year. So sad to see her go. You know, just putting the blocks

together right there. You don't need to be an investigator to see the president brought her in to restore confidence in the agency. And now she's leaving. And she doesn't really give a reason why she's transitioning now to leave. But remember, just a handful of months ago, let's backtrack this a little bit. We saw the media take a stance with the CDC that none of us have

ever seen really in our lifetimes, which was a critical stance against the CDC's really science communication during the pandemic and the director herself. Remember this from just about five, six months ago. Take a look. Big shake up at the CDC, or at least that's what they say is going to happen here. Startling admission from the head of the CDC that the agency has made serious mistakes

during this COVID pandemic, which has killed more than a million Americans. The CDC mishandled the COVID pandemic. Its messaging was confusing and overwhelming time and time again. The agency did not act quickly enough. And now it's a need of a drastic overhaul. And that's the message today from the CDC's own director, Dr. Rochelle Walensky. Dr. Rochelle Walensky is now calling for fundamental change to restore the

public's trust in a statement she wrote for 75 years. CDC and public health have been preparing for COVID-19. And in our big moment, our performance did not reliably meet expectations. My goal is a new public health action oriented culture at the CDC that emphasizes accountability, collaboration, communication and timeliness. If you want the agency to do a few things in particular, hold itself more accountable, speak about

public health issues in plain English and share more scientific findings more quickly. All of it to help the agency prepare for future public health emergencies. We made some pretty public mistakes. We need to own them. We have been right and we now know the CDC was wrong almost the entire time through this. Absolutely. And you got to give her credit because in the selection between gaslight

the public or maybe start to approach the fact that you were wrong or your agency was wrong, she chose the latter, which is commendable. And she is stepping down, which she is also commendable because, you know, again, she was at the head of this agency as it just destroyed the trust of the American people. But, you know, for one last time, let's take a deeper look

at Walensky as she is. She rides off into the sunset most likely as far as statistics are concerned, probably into a board of directors position, a pharma company because that's what a lot of these directors do. We probably take bets on that. But let's look back at her legacy and some of the things that she mentioned. So remember when the vaccine was being rolled out, the

FDA didn't even look at if this thing stopped transmission. And Walensky was put out there to message this thing. Let's get this vaccine in arms. The science was rushed. It's not really there for safety science, but we got to sell this thing anyway. This is Richelwald Inske doing exactly that. Take a look. I'm going to pause here. I'm going to lose the script. And I'm going

to reflect on the recurring feeling I have of impending view. We have so much to look forward to, so much promise and potential of where we are and so much reason for hope. But right now, I'm scared. Our data from the CDC's today suggests, you know, that that vaccinated people do not carry the virus don't get sick. And that it's not just in the clinical trials,

but it's also in real world data. If you were to get infection with and vaccinated, could you give it to somebody else? Where you silently able to spread it? Those data were not covered in the clinical trials, but now data have emerged again that have demonstrated that even if you were to get infected during post vaccination, that you can't give it to anyone else. How many

times do we have to look at those things? And, you know, TAT was pointing out, you know, one of our COO and one of the heads of our researchers is pointing out that that first video, which is like, I'm going to go off script here. And I want to tell you that, you know, she starts reading and that I'm really scared. And, you know, I mean,

this is why we don't trust these people, right? I mean, you don't even know how to go off script. You can't even actually honestly talk to us. And the truth is, you can't be honest because you're not telling us the truth, right? You're not, you're just speaking of feeling total baloney as though it's fact. Right. And it really important when she said, I'm really scared. And

she's fearful. The very next day, I believe it was that she started saying, we're hopeful now we have this vaccine is going to do this and that. So let's go back just to remember as she's saying these things, even in the clinical trials, Peter Doshi, editor at the BMJ, he wrote this in October 2020. This was when the trials were going on. Headline will COVID-19 vaccine

save lives current trials aren't designed to tell us. And it says in here, none of the trials currently underwear designed to detect a reduction in any serious outcome such as hospital admissions, use of intensive care deaths, nor are the vaccines being studied to determine whether they can interrupt transmission of the virus. So right from the get go, that's what that's what Wylinski is trying to sell.

That's a tough sell. But after she came out there and said, if you get the virus and you're vaccinated, you can't give it to anyone. It locks it up in your body. It's like a jail cell is never going to get out again. And we're going to be out of this pandemic. And oh, my I'm so hopeful. Well, she had to go out. The CDC had

to go out. Correct her statement. And then she had to go out and correct it herself. This is her trying to tell you the new science after that. Because it changes so fast. Take a listen. Here's the new science that we saw just in the last several days. With prior variants, when people had these rare breakthrough infections, we didn't see the capacity of them to spread

the virus to others. But with the Delta variant, we now see in our outbreak investigations that have been occurring over the last couple of weeks in those outbreaks. outbreak investigations, we have been seeing that if you happen to have one of those breakthrough infections, that you can actually now pass it to somebody else. We thought that was really important for people to know and understand. Because

when people are out there vaccinated, thinking that even if they get mild illness, they can't give it to someone else. If they're then going to a loved one who's immunocompromised, who isn't yet vaccinated or couldn't yet be vaccinated, we wanted them to take the protection to protect others. So that was the new science that prompted the guidance. And it was not, it was it weighed heavily.

I know that this is not a message America wants to hear. The reason I was asking is because just yesterday, you also put out the CDC did a new science brief, which contained this sentence. These findings along with the early evidence for reduce viral load and vaccinated people who developed COVID-19 suggests that any associated transmission risk is likely to be substantially reduced and vaccinated people. So

even though that brief came out just yesterday, you're saying, that's no longer operative. Yeah, we are, you know, this, as I said, the science that prompted this guidance is just days old. And in the coming days, you will actually see the published information on the science that motivated this change. I mean, when she says, you know, this is just not a message America wants to hear.

No, because you took away my job. Why don't I have a job? I was, my job was taken away because I was told I was supposed to be protecting my neighbor. And now the entire purpose of a mandated vaccine, which should have never happened. Anyway, you didn't even rise to the entire point. I mean, I mean, it was incredible that they just didn't have people like

marching in the streets, you know, going into the capital and saying, I've had it, get out, get out of the castle. It's over for you. I was insane when they finally admitted those things. Right. And, and you know, it hats off a guest to CNN there for asking, I mean, just a little pointed question. You see how so easy that is when you have someone in

a chair just ask the questions, ask the hard questions, go off, let's take a little, I want to talk about, you know, what I can accomplish with my status as a kid with a soul of about might have difficulty. So then I would answer questions who she heard that from. Take a listen. I can tell you where it was when the CNN became that it was

95% effective on the vaccine. So many of us wanted to be hopeful. So many of us wanted to say, okay, this is our ticket out, right? Now we're done. So I think we had perhaps too little caution and too much optimism for some good things that came our way. I really do. I think all of us wanted this to be done. Nobody said, when, when, you

know, this vaccine is going to work, oh well, maybe it'll work at all, we're off. Nobody said, well, what if the next variant doesn't, it doesn't, it's not as potent against the next variant. The head of the CDC says I remember where I was when CNN said it's 95% effective. You remember where you were? I remember I was watching the news too. I thought that was

coming from the head of the CDC. Oh my God. CNN just declared it. We're good. It's incredible. Like talking about the tail wagging the dog, if you will. Right. I mean, maybe where were you when you received the Pfizer press release? That CNN read the next day on air. So, you know, she says, some key points in there. As we're looking back here in this time

capsule forever more. She says, we, no one, no one really thought the vaccine would weigh. Nobody thought that. Okay. That's good to know. The minds of the CDC and their infinite wisdom aren't even thinking ahead for troubleshoot this thing. It's just going to work on all variants. And by the way, by the way, it only happens to be the tragic flaw that we've been discussing in

every upper respiratory illness and why the flu shot never works. Why they never really established a working vaccine by Fauci's own men's because they mutate so fast that they just overcome any vaccination or anything you do. So wrong. The truth is it's that's why we've never had a decent flu shot. All the scientists in the world know the problem is these things just mutate. They're going

to be too damn fast. But right. Exactly. And so we're going to go ahead and do a little fact check on Rochelle Wollinsky before she leaves in CDC. And she said, no one was talking about waiting. No one was talking about this thing being a problem. Actually, it's on record. Gert banded Bosch. He is the highly accredited verologist microbiologist. He worked at the Bill and Melinda

Gates Foundation as one of their head vaccine directors for world health population. Three months after the first shots went into US arms. He put out this dire warning. He said, the single most important public health emergency of international concern. And that was not the COVID pandemic. That was using vaccines. He says in a way that would endanger public health during a pandemic. Basically a hot pandemic.

Yeah. And this is what he also had to say. He made a video at that time to take a listen. All right. Dear colleagues at the WHO. My name is here. I'm a certified expert in microbiology and infectious diseases. I have a PhD in virology and I have a long standing career in human vaccinology. I'm urging you to immediately open the scientific debate on how human

interventions in the COVID-19 pandemic. Or currently, I'm going to take a look at the vaccine. I'm urging you to invite me for a scientific hearing open to the public and to scientists all over the world on this very topic. Ignoring or denying the impact of stringent infection prevention measures combined with mass infection prevention measures combined with the virus. Mass vaccination using prophylactic vaccines is a colossal

blunder. Please do listen to my cry of distress. And let's first and foremost deliberate on a scientifically justified strategy to mitigate the tsunami of morbidity and letality that is now threatening us. And let's meanwhile, devise a strategy to eradicate the steadily emerging highly infectious variants. On behalf of humanity, I sincerely thank you for considering my call. Still one of the most chilling videos I think ever

made and he was saying it there. You are creating the variance. This vaccine is driving variants. It's exactly what we saw. They took a fast mutating virus and accelerated it. We may have seen, you know, 20, maybe even 50 years of evolution in the course of one or two years because of what that vaccine did with this virus. And to Mickey's point earlier, you know, I

remember saying the gear. I hope you're right. I hope that we don't end up creating some deadly coronavirus. And hopefully should everything stay where it's at. Maybe we've avoided that catastrophe, but we do have, you know, a million, over a million people dead here in America, a total disaster. You can't call that a success in any stretch of the imagination. America did worse than almost every

other nation in the world. Certainly worse than all the third world nations that could even get near the vaccine. They did far better. And so, you know, but what we've talked about, he wasn't invited to the table. Richelle Wollinsky now saying she's leaving the CDC. I was just trying to create this appearance in the space where this communication, you didn't let anybody that actually knew what

they were talking about. Guys like that, virologist from the WHO, giving you a dire warning. Instead, you thrust everybody in this horrific vaccine program. And it's lack of efficacy will go down as one of the least of its problems. The biggest problem I think of the health outcomes that we're reporting on all the time and the growing issues around, you know, first of all, the heart

attacks, the thrombocytopenia, the myocardial arthritis, blood clots, but now this rising concern and cancer, which, which may be the legacy of this entire thing. And again, I hope we're wrong. And as she said, no one was thinking 95% effective wouldn't stop this thing. No one thought about waning. Now let's look at the headlines. Let's look how wrong she was. Current headline vaccine developers can't keep up

with COVID mutations. And we reported on this. We knew this was going to happen. You can't chase this virus. And even this new byvalent that they just updated. It's not being able to keep up with this. It's the immunity's not lasting. So they're in a real pickle. But now let's just move on. So that's obviously a second we can go on and on about this. We

have over. That's three years. But now let's talk about this. So here we are. The COVID vaccine is out. It's launched. She's a salesperson. Fought she's a salesperson. You even see Biden up there saying get the shot launched on the back of the largest funded vaccine campaign ever. And also the most authoritarian in US history. We have a problem now. This great. Medical intervention that they're

telling us is having some side effects, some harms. And one of them is heart inflammation. And Wielinsky has to address this on air. Take a listen. I want to start with myocarditis that rare heart inflammation. There are now more than 300 cases being investigated. Of course, that's out of millions of people who've been fully vaccinated. Is there enough evidence though now to officially confirm the link

between the vaccines and this rare condition? Good morning. We certainly are looking at this carefully. We have an ACIP meeting that has been scheduled for next week. And we are going to be eager to look at the data during that meeting. What I will say is over 200 million doses of vaccine have been given. And really these events are really quite rare. They are, as you

note, mine are self limited. They generally resolve with rest and standard medications. And what we're really saying is the risk of the disease. These itself, we've had 300 pediatric deaths. We've had over 4,000 children with the MISC syndrome that have resulted in even more deaths, 36 more deaths. And so what we're really saying is in that context, these cases of mild heart inflammation, the risk of

that, which are quite rare, are overwhelmed by the benefit of getting vaccinated. Did you say rare? I don't know. I didn't hear that. Right. So, I'm going to be able to say that. Here's a little cheat sheet. If someone asks about a problem with either vaccination or even just a medication, if someone in authority, like she is there, pivots and talks about how much they've given

out, how much have been sold over the course of 10 years, that's a problem because they're deflecting the question. But what's interesting is some people did look at that risk benefit analysis, Tracy Hogue, a biostatition epidemiologist. She did a study with her co-authors and they used part of the study. They used the veris system, the CDC's own system for reporting vaccine injuries. And then she looked

at the Pfizer vaccine, associated myopary carditis and adolescents, a stratified risk benefit analysis. And they write this, weighing post-vaccination myopary carditis against COVID-19 hospitalizations during Delta, it's a Delta area. Our risk benefit analysis suggests that among 12 to 17 year olds, two dose vaccination, vaccination was uniformly favorable only in non-immunals with a comorbidity. So only one group out of everybody now goes on to say this

though, in boys with prior infection and no comorbidities, even one dose carried more risk than benefit according to the national estimates. In the setting of Omicron, one dose may be protective in non-immun children, but dose two does not appear to confer additional benefit at a population level. So you have this very thin slice of favorable data for one comorbidity for a person that doesn't have natural

immunity that has never come in contact with the virus. The rest of the people, especially boys, you got a problem there. And the CDC, A-SIP meeting after A-SIP meeting, nothing's wrong. We've given so many doses of these things. And so just some medication and some rest. By the way, you put in a kid on heart medication when they have this. And rest is typically about six

months of no physical activity. And when the myocarditis happens, we've had doctors on talking about this. If the cell, the heart cells die from this, some of the heart cells die. They never come back. So that affects someone down the road. They're studied to show that. But we have the Nordic countries. They did act on this. So the headlines shortly after that, this is four a

month after Walinsky was on the CNN there. Nordic countries are restricting the use of Moderna's COVID vaccine. Here's why it's because myocarditis. That's Finland, Denmark, Sweden. They just pulled it. And then because the CDC really wasn't making any action on this, you had states doing their own work. This is Florida Surgeon General Joseph Lattopo. And on October 2020-22, he said this. He put out a press

release. State Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Lattopo issues new mRNA COVID-19 vaccine guidance. He used Florida's data tracking system. So they did it in house there in the state. And it says this in the press release. This was really big breaking news at the time. This analysis found that there is an 84% increase in the relative incidents of cardiac related death among males 18 to 39 years

old within 28 days following mRNA vaccination. As such, the state Surgeon General recommends against males aged 18 to 39 from receiving mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, not a word from the CDC. No problem. We've given millions of doses. It's rare. And it generally resolves on its own, although they're not tracking these kids for their life, just, you know, typically 28-day windows six months here a year there. And

I think about every time I look at these stats and we've watched all of these videos of football players and students collapsing on fields, dying heart attacks all over the world. And think how many of those ever end up in a very serious system they don't. And because the news is all like, we have no idea what happened. When we see them say how many times

no idea, one idea you do know is that they weren't reported as a myocarditis case or any of that. So when you were even trying to make this comparison, you're talking about something that is so completely under reported because the people reporting it are your doctors who have been brainwashed believe that there is no issue here. And so the whole thing is really just a mess

and a disaster. And we know the truth. Yeah. And you know, one more data point before we let Rochelle go into the wild blue yonder of big farmer revolving doors perhaps is the topic of masking. The CDC was really out front in masking masking children and children with disabilities masking the entire population with really science that that wasn't quite as robust as we would like to

see it to say it to say it really briefly. Now, Wellinsky was pulled in front of a congressional hearing to talk about this. This is just before she announced her resignation. And this is what that looked like on the point of masking. Check this out. All right. I had doctors who spent ears and medicine telling me that the mask were not effective. And yet, these were

being forced on people. They're forced on school kids. And you know, when you combine, particularly young kids, we're seeing the devastating impact that had on their educational attainment. And it kind of surprises me that the NIH CDC didn't do any follow-up testing. Even while this was going on to determine the effectiveness of this and the impact that was going to have on kids. Yeah, I appreciate.

You know, in order to do a randomized clinical trial, you need to actually have Equipois in the question. And ultimately what would happen, what happened is that there were so many studies that demonstrated time and time again in the height of COVID transmission that masks were working to prevent transmission. But I'm not sure anybody would have proposed a clinical trial because in fact there was an

Equipois to the question anymore. I mean, basically saying nobody ever questioned whether it could. We all knew it was, were believed at the fact that the mask worked. And it's okay. I'll let you take it. She uses that word there. Equipois. Yeah. Where we just, you know, perhaps one of the more arrogant moments in history for a medical leader to talk about. But she says no

one was even questioning this. So let's look at somebody that was questionist. A smaller person, not in statue, but Tony Fauci, not really that important person in the pandemic response. Sorry. That's just a lowly person. Maybe it just a step up from a groundskeeper. He says this in an email, an internal email in the beginning of the pandemic in February. This thing is uncertain. So this

would be the time when you'd be really want to take caution. And he says this to Sylvia Burwell. Sylvia, because Sylvia was going to go on a little trip and an international trip. And she asked Tony Fauci, should I wear a mask? She says masks are really, for infected people to prevent them from spreading infection to people who are not infected rather than protecting uninfected people

very low risk location, your instincts are correct. Money is best spent on medical countermeasures, such as diagnostics and vaccines. And so remember, he says these holes are so big that this things passed the material. Remember, we have the tests where people were using the vaping. And it was just going through this material. There's there's a visual equipois for you. But if you need it. But then,

you know, just just a month later. So that's an internal email. And you people could say, well, that's one person he was advising is not his guidance for the entire country. A month later, you have him on an interview. 60 minutes interview doubling down. Take a look. There's a lot of confusion among people and misinformation surrounding face masks. Can you discuss that? The masks are important

for someone who's infected to prevent them from infecting someone else. Now, when you see people and look at the films in China and South Korea, whatever everybody's wearing a mask, right now in the United States, people should not be walking around with masks. You're sure of it because people are listening really closely to this. Right now people should not be walking. There's no reason to be

walking around with a mask. When you're in the middle of an outbreak, wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better. And it might even block a droplet. But it's not providing the perfect protection that people think that it is. And often, there are unintended consequences. People keep fiddling with the mask and they keep touching their face. Can you get some schmutz sort of

staying inside there? Of course, of course. But when you think masks, you should think of healthcare providers needing them and people who are ill. I mean, so there you have it. A lot of employees, though. Yeah, I mean, the whole thing started with the question we looked at. There really, and Deney Rancourt was really big on showing, there's no decent studies here. Where is this coming

from? We've done so little studies on masks. It doesn't look like they actually, they're designed to stop you from drooling into your patient. And that's about all that surgical masks we're ever designed to do, not to stop fine water droplets and coronavirus is even smaller than that. But again, so she goes out the door and what we have to remember is that, I mean, I guess

in some ways, if I'm supposed to have some empathy, it's clear that she was just a puppet. It's just clear that she was being sent out to bring the next line of baloney to us. And look, she signed up for that job. I don't know if she knew that was what the job was, but she now has a legacy of being the person that lied to

the world. You wonder if deep down she feels like that was who she really was. Right, right. And as she's walking out here, there's still a question of, should people still be wearing masks? And there's a study by the Cochrane Collaboration. We reported on that, but she saw this. I would be assuming she saw this because there's all over the news, 10 days before that congressional

hearing where she said, no one really questioned masks. And when you look at this study, this was one of the most, if you will, we're going to be able to see the results. We've got robust studies, analysis of all the mass studies. And it said they make little, when very masks and community make little or no difference, it says, to the outcome of both COVID and

influenza, like illnesses. But it also said that harms were rarely measured and poorly reported. And that's been one of the biggest issues. It's not so much can these protect us, but it's hurting the kids. It's hurting their development. And they're saying these studies didn't even account for that. So totally tone deaf on the CDC's part. But I guess in some irony, as she's leaving this agency

and the WHO is announcing that COVID is no longer an emergency, the Biden administration has ended the emergency, there's still one emergency left. And apparently, that's within the CDC. Here's the headline. The CDC opens a probe after 35 tests positive for COVID following CDC conference. So yes, leave it up to the CDC to be the last hot spot of COVID before this thing really winds up.

That's amazing. That's great. As we move forward, there's one thing that really the COVID response did do. And that was to make people really question vaccines in a very serious way. As you said, Del, they're going to make the cookies in full view of everybody. No one's ever watched had this much of an eye on the vaccine making and safety testing process. And you predicted this

was going to be a disaster. And this is what the headlines look like as this shot, as the shot was being rolled out, and throughout the years, US public now divided over whether to get COVID-19 vaccines. We see that hasn't it's the creeping up. But now the problem became this. COVID vaccine concerns are starting to spill over into routine immunizations. Now we got a problem. So

that's where we sit right now. It was so bad. Their response and their rush safety testing was so bad that people are now questioning all vaccines go, wait a minute. They just did that right in front of our face. What have they done in the past that I'm seeing? So I'm still injecting into my kid. So enter Chelsea Clinton, the daughter of Hillary Clinton. And she

runs the Clinton. She's a vice chair that Clinton Health Access Initiative. And she has announced a new partnership and a new campaign. And well, I guess you can just hear it from her. Take a listen. All right. I do think though, you know, when you ask about the role of public private partnerships kind of after the last few years, I think we spend so much time

understandably focused on the mRNA vaccines and technologies. I spend a lot of time thinking about the really unfortunate to try to use a not too judgmental word. Kind of rise in not only kind of vaccine hesitancy and questioning, but outright kind of rejection of vaccines and of kind of science and the scientific kind of process. And also too often on our scientists are epidemiologists, our frontline

healthcare workers. And so I do think we need to have a much more robust conversation and sense of urgency. Because I think we are less prepared today than we were arguably in January of 2020, partly because of the kind of lack of trust and confidence. And not only are scientists, but in science itself, and certainly in the public health professionals. And so I think we need

kind of the public sector to hopefully stop doing things like stripping away. Public health emergency powers from state public health agencies. We also need the private sector to help candidly do a better job of helping explain kind of the science that you are already commercializing and bringing to market, but also what you're working on. And help us kind of in the broader conversation. Not be uncomfortable

with the discomfort of uncertainty. And so I do think we need really good ideas for how best to do that. Because we all deserve to hopefully, not be as unprepared as I worry we are at the moment. The last thing I'll say is a new effort that we're a part of is the new initiative launched by the World Health Organization last week to try to catch

kids up on their routine immunizations. In 2021 alone, more than 25 million kids under the age of one missed at least one routine immunization. And so we're working with WHO and the Gates Foundation and others to hopefully have the largest kind of childhood immunization. Effort ever over the next 18 months to catch as many kids up as possible. Because no one should die of polio or

measles or pneumonia, including in this country where we also need people to be vaccinated or kids. Some amazing to think the last three years was the largest immunization, you know, mass immunization effort ever made. And now she wants to start another one right away the next 18 months. I'm coming at you. I'm sure there'll be billions of dollars funding this. And you just listen to the

language. Things like we've really got to stop stripping the health departments of their emergency powers because that was how we were planning on taking over the world. So I'm getting back together with Bill Gates and the WHO. We're going to, you know, seal this all back up and get back to our journey to take over your lives. I mean, it's really the language you can hear

it. You hear it come out of the W E F World Economic Forum. You can feel that sense of her. And that she feels entitled to this power in this space. Right. And that's a good point because she said she's concerned about the questioning of vaccines. And why is she concerned? Well, through her own words, this is actually the headline of why she's taking up this

crusade. Is she a politician? No, is she a doctor? No, she's a person of privilege and power. Chelsea Clinton's campaign against vaccine misinformation began when a stranger, a costeter, but we go in the article. She basically said a woman came up to her New York City and urged her not to vaccinate her kids. She was pregnant at the time. So that started her out on this

journey of a mother, basically, or somebody that's passionate about vaccines, urging her not to vaccinate her kid. And she was so moved by that that she's going to start a worldwide campaign on vaccinations because of her one experience. Well, there's other people I have experiences too. And they get a voice too. Now, let's look at open verres. That's a vaccine adverse event reporting system where you

report if you have a problem with a vaccine after you've taken it or a family member. And there's over 2.5 million reports of adverse events or harms in verres. Some of those people probably have something to say about it. Over 45,000 total reported deaths. I'm sure a lot of those families of those people have a lot to say about vaccines and hospitalizations as well. So could

it be, you know, let's look at Chelsea's mom. Could it be that there may be some other influence in there in 2016. This was Reuters during the summer. Clinton outpaces rivals in drug company donations. It says President nominee Hillary Clinton has taken more money from employees of America's 15 biggest farmers. So we have that. But now we get to the real problem here. The real question.

And this is very interesting. This is time magazines. Most recent headline. The most effective way they say to get through to parents who won't vaccinate their kids. What are we going to try this time? Well, it says according to a new study in the journal Pediatrics, which focused on COVID-19 vaccines in particular, but has implications for all vaccine campaigns. Vaccination campaigns. If you want to persuade

parents to get vaccinated, they're going to be able to get vaccinated. The most convincing arguments may not come from healthcare professionals, but from other trusted parents. Yup. We've known that here at the highway for a very long time. And it's interesting. Because now they're throwing out the healthcare professionals before the talking point was trust your doctor. Say for an effective trusted voices. Now it's maybe just

sidestep those healthcare professionals for a little while because they've lost their trust is trusted parents. And you know, that's what JB Hanley said on the Spellers documentary when someone came to him and said, this technique really works. He says, I don't care about the science. I don't care about the trusted professionals. I care about autism parents because that's a strong community that is trusted. And that's

all he cares about. And you know, these are the same parents I may add that have been watching I can legal letters go out watching I can legal work. It's particularly the debate between HHS CDC FDA and I can attorneys. We asked them point blank questions about vaccine safety that they could not adequately answer. And parents have been reading that for years since 2017 was the

first letter. And those are what parents that is the communication that parents have been using to talk to people about this information. So I guess it's finally good that the vaccine hesitancy research crowd is understanding the strength of parents, but good luck because that that that place is already really saturated with a lot of good science. And you make a great point. We do not really

do enough to sort of sell all the work that we've done. But if your brand knew or just came into the last few weeks, you're probably not aware that we have written extensively white papers on the safety of vaccines or website I can decide or which contains all of our legal and science work just go there and the vaccine safety debate. You can type it all

at once. Just go to I can decide or put it in the search the vaccine safety debate. And you will literally read the letters that we submitted to HHS. They responded to us. And then we had a response to them all of it connected to links both from their side and ours. So you can see the evidence to our conversation. And you will see that they

never responded to our final response because the truth is is we have won that debate. They're really in trouble. And the world is shifting because of that work that we've done. So it's a really great point Jeffrey. As a researcher in this space, it's one of the most shocking documents you will ever read on this subject. I urge everyone to go see that. And you know

this. This isn't the last time or the first I should say this is the first time that the high wire is bumped up against Chelsea Clinton. During the first year of of really since we were on air, Chelsea Clinton was she received an honor, a really good honor from the high wire, which was Vax hole of the week. If you don't remember that or you're just

new to this, you're just new to watching the high wire. This is what that look like. All right. The Vax hole of the week someone who quotes vaccine science that does not exist. Who is it drum roll please. It's Chelsea Clinton Chelsea. You are the Vax hole of the week. Can't just make latent statements and not look at the science. She wrote goodness gracious hashtag vaccines

work to protect people and dogs. I didn't know she went to med school, but apparently she knows everything. She keeps quoting how great vaccines are. I don't know if she vaccinated her baby with a happy vaccine on day one. Something tells me I doubt it. But if she did, then you really, really lack intelligence. I'm a person who has been a progressive liberal for life. I

voted for Clinton both times. I do not like it when people quote science that does not exist. It's the sickest nation of kids we've ever seen. Sickest dogs we've ever seen. Sickest cats we've ever seen. If we're doing it right, why is that the case? If you're a Vax hole, stop being one. Do your research. Do your science. I don't know whether I should be a

barrister or psyched. I mean, it's great to look back at that feels like ages ago, really, but I'm amazing. That was just like the 17th episode of the High Wires. So we were only four weeks, four months in, I guess, really because we do it once a week. So really early on, you see how low tech it was back before I could afford a haircut. All

of those things. But here's what was amazing about it. We were just this little startup on the internet, but she actually retweeted our Vax hole. The week here it is. If any of the Vax folks will focus on me instead of spreading fake news, I'm more than okay with that. Hashtag Vaxies were to protect the children's safe lives. She essentially built our audience. I mean, our

audience is the audience that Hillary Clinton, I mean, she had that Chelsea Clinton built. And when you look at that, we were nobody. And all of a sudden, we got like all of her like millions of followers, like started to it again. And the High Wires went for thousands to like hundreds of thousands. So Chelsea, I just want to say that this big war that you're

involved in, and I suppose we're one of the bad guys in this world. Because we are speaking truth to science and we do believe in the scientific method. And what we're celebrating is how science should be done. And, but in some ways, you made this monster. You built it. You helped us do it. So, you know, there it is. Once again, we got to love our

opponents and recognize sometimes they do good things for us. Great reporting, Jeffrey. Amazing to watch Hillary. I mean, I mean, all these names now. Michelle Wollinsky moving off into the distance. Yes, we will see what the next CDC director brings. And by the way, this is why we keep talking about these issues. It's not over. COVID may be over, but the attack and the onslaught, the

desire to inject your children with untested products. And if you think the COVID vaccine was an anomaly, it's not. They all, what you just saw was how they made all the vaccines. That fast, that rough, that untested, that short lived as far as the safety studies go. And we'll continue to keep reporting on all that. Keep up the great work, Jeffrey. Appreciate it. Thank you, Patel.

Thank you. All right. Well, you know, look, it's when we look back and you see the work that we've done for those of you that were with us from the beginning, you were the ones that have made it possible to go outside of that little clause that we started in to start funding legal cases where we weren't just reporting on things. We were able to start

making a difference in this world. And what a difference we have made from that moment, you know, when you look at what they're talking about, we have so many parents that are now better educated than they're doctors. That's why they're taking the front line doctors out of conversation because the half a day education. That's what it is admitted by the WHO and universities across the world.

Your pediatrician gets a half a day education. They're entire medical school experience on vaccination. We've obviously, if you've been watching the high wire, even for three weeks, you've now been educated with far more information than your pediatrician ever got. And if you go and read the vaccine safety papers that are over at IcantheSide.org, I guarantee you, you should be handed a doctorate, at least when it

comes to vaccines because your pediatrician doesn't know any of that. So go and get it, download it, take it to your friends of pediatrician. Say, look, it is cited. There are links here. These are serious issues. But, you know, this is, you've been a part of this. You look back in 2017. Look how far we've come. We have so much we want to do right now.

There is so much. We are actually, you can feel the momentum. We just shifted the law and just get a specific, they now have a religious exemption. So not only is this vaccine issue talking about vaccines and body autonomy. We're bringing back your right to choice. Your right to, you know, your freedom of speech, your freedom of religious perspective. And by the way, as Aaron's three

pointed out, you don't have to be in religion. The United States of America says that you define that yourself. It means your deeply held beliefs. Who, what other news agency do you know one, a law, reinstate, or what are you creating the power of your deeply held beliefs? I can't think of one, except this, the high wire and the informed consent action network. We have some

massive lawsuits we're bringing now. We have now got the wind at our backs, but it is going to get expensive. And remember, as Mickey Willis, you're watching his journey out of the pandemic, just vaccines, not starting to look at the much bigger picture. That's what the high wire is doing. If you think we're just reporting on issues when it comes to, you know, some centralized digital

currency. Or the idea that they're trying to affect, you know, your child's gender and make them question their sexuality at young ages inside of schools. We are fighting legal cases on all of those things too now. So we're fighting on multiple fronts, which we means we need your help more than ever. So please, if you're one of those people that's been watching what's taking place, stop

being a watcher, get in action, donate to I can go to the top button on any of our websites. You'll find the donation page. We're asking you to donate $23 for 2023, but honestly, a dollar makes a difference. Make the effort. I mean, the effort is probably the most expensive part of what I'm asking you to do right now. Just go to the website, say, I'll

sign up for a dollar because we have millions of you. We have what was over 11 million people are now on a journey to share spellers with everyone we know. Your help, your ability to help us get this word out, to build this organization that is big as it is, is now going to literally make it so that children trapped in their bodies are going to

be able to speak and tell their truth and maybe someday be in politics, someday be writing novels, someday explain to us what they've observed about us when they were not able to speak. All of this is made possible here and nowhere else for those of you that have been supporting us. Pat yourself on the back right now. This is an experiment that is proven to be

absolutely brilliant. We are changing the world and you're making that possible. And we're hiring new writers all the time for that great article coming your way. We're getting rave reviews on the articles that are taking place there. All right. So to get to, we're kind of like looking back because there's a lot happening in the science. There's this real clarity now looking back in the review

mirror. But what's amazing is it's a clarity that the high wire has proved it had the entire time. We knew where we were looking but one of the big transformational moments for us on this show in the middle of COVID when there was not a lot making sense. We were trying to find our balance. There was one guy Kyle Sidel and ER doctor in New York

that I will always say this was like the Paul Revere moment that came out and warned the world. We are doing something wrong. We do not understand this virus. The way we're treating this in hospitals is wrong. Everybody listen to me. We must we must stop this now. This is what he had to say. Nine days ago, I opened an intensive care unit to care for

the sickest COVID positive patients in the city. These nine days, I have seen things I have never seen before. In treating these patients, I have witnessed medical phenomenon that just don't make sense in the context of treating a disease that is supposed to be a viral pneumonia. COVID-19 lung disease as far as I can see is not a pneumonia and should not be treated as one.

It appears as some kind of viral induced disease, most resembling high altitude sickness. I have seen patients dependent on oxygen, take off their oxygen and quickly progress through a state of anxiety and emotional distress. And eventually get blue in the face. And while they look like patients absolutely on the brink of death, they do not look like patients dying of pneumonia. The patients I'm seeing in

front of me look most like as if a person was dropped off on the top of Mount Everest without time to acclimate. I don't know the final answer of this disease, but I'm quite sure that a ventilator is not it. Well, I mean, I think that even in the middle of the crisis, it was clear that the ventilators were killing nine days. But now, brand new

study is shedding light on the fact that it may actually not just be COVID that was killing people, but a secondary infection caused by the hospitals themselves. Take a look at this as the headline. What really killed COVID-19 patients, it wasn't a site of kind of storm suggests study. It goes on to say this, by applying machine learning. So AI basically, to medical record data, scientists

at Northwestern University of Fineberg School of Medicine found that secondary bacterial pneumonia that does not resolve was a key driver of death in patients with COVID-19. It may even exceed death rates from the viral infection itself. It goes on to say our study highlights the importance of preventing looking for an aggressively treating secondary bacterial pneumonia and critically ill patients with severe pneumonia, including those with COVID-19.

We have been saying this on the high wire almost the entire time. COVID is not killing people. Medical now practice is the fact that we were denying that we had a lot of treatment that worked and using treatments that did not work. Is there real reason I believe while over a million people are now said to have died from COVID, the United States of America, one

of the worst death records in the entire world when it comes to COVID. Well, one of the doctors that we had on very early had a solution and was talking about this secondary infection. And it was all he could do to hold onto his license and his job like all the others that were speaking truth. I'm talking about Dr. Richard Bartlett. This is what he was

like when he was on our show a long time ago. As an ER doctor, you're wanting to stabilize your patient. And so if they come in and they tell me, I can't breathe, I'm going to try to help them breathe. And so this actually is effective. They on their first breathing treatment, many people tell me that their shortness of breath and their chest pain goes away

during the treatment. They don't feel like they're drowning anymore. COVID is an inflammatory lung disease. Udescanide is an anti-inflammatory medicine for the lungs. It blocks the release of all the inflammatory chemicals that are released with COVID. But beyond that, how about a targeted approach? Because if you use IV or oral steroids or steroids is a shot, which you're commonly used, these are the side effects every

time. You decrease bone density, you decrease muscle mass, it can cause anxiety and insomnia. It decreases the ability to heal. It decreases your immune system's ability to fight infection. And one of the potentials is a secondary bacterial infection, double pneumonia or a bacterial pneumonia. And so why would we want that? Why don't we use a targeted approach with inhaled steroids where you're actually turning the faucet

off of these cytokines being released into the body, which is the killer? Right at the source? Why isn't it sweeping America? Why do we not owe one of those? Well, there's definitely some research. And so the video that you saw, 5 million views and then YouTube pulled it. Twitter pulls it. It's against the messaging that we're supposed to be following. He was had an interview with

Matthew McConaughey on the internet. And he said to Matthew that you deconize just a placebo Matthew, it doesn't really work. Oxford University said the opposite. Oxford is the oldest university in the English speaking world since 1096, 72 Nobel Prize laureates. They say that he's wrong. Over and over again, this was being buried. Medicine's FDA approved 25 years ago. It's well documented to be an effective safe

strategy for decreasing inflammation in the lungs in other ways. And that is what COVID is about. Amazing right there in the middle of it. Dr. Richard Bartlett talked about the secondary infection, trying to take care of the lungs right away with a buttesanite of steroid, inhaled the lungs, all the advantages over that over injected steroids. And that's my honor and pleasure to be joined now by

a truth teller, a profit, if you will, in what you saw, where things were going. First of all, we really haven't had a moment to hang out. And because you were one of the busiest humans in the middle of COVID I had ever seen. You treated almost everyone in our company when we were catching COVID. We went with the protocol that you were sharing with us.

And you always took our phone call. But honestly, I think you must have been working 20 hour days. It was really crazy. If you got in a little rest, now that COVID is sort of in our rearview mirror here. Well, life is still busy. But, Dell, I want to congratulate you and the high wire when other sources were on purpose hiding this life saving information from

the public. You went out of your way. You went out on a limb and you told the truth, life saving information. And so thank you for what you did. It's amazing. There's a lot we can get into. But just the fact that it wasn't hard to make the decision because honestly, what were the side effects? I mean, inhaling, be desanide. This isn't, there's like relatively zero

risk. And so even if it didn't work, who cares? We're talking to someone saying, I don't know, you're likely to die, especially if it's going south. And we don't have a single answer for you. But the idea of attacking every incident seemed to come up. And be desanide was a big one. We've been exonerated time and time again. You have the Oxford study that we've discussed.

We want to take a look at that really quick with be desanide. This is what Oxford had to say. Common asmet treatment reduces need for hospitalization in COVID-19 patients. Studies suggest Oxford. This is folks the findings from 146 people of whom half took 800 micrograms of the medication twice a day and half run usual care suggests that inhale be desanide reduced the relative risk of requiring

urgent care or hospitalization. Meaning before you ever went near event, by 90% in the 28 day study period participants allocated the be desanide and hail are also at a quicker resolution. Sort of a lower dose, you know, a little whiff. And hail even seemed to work. And that's going back February 9th, 2021. The answer was there. And yet there was this, this huge pushback. You know,

why? No, we were told to be afraid. Be very afraid. We were told shelter in place. Literally hide in place and just trust the government to come up with a new miracle one time, one shot done deal. As soon as we had enough of the population quote vaccinated, we were going to get our normal lives back. Right. Did we ever get our normal lives back after

one shot? No. And so there was definitely an agenda. I think we can say that openly now. Yeah. Because clearly misinformation was coming from the top. Yeah. Anthony Fauci. Dissing. We have a strategy we're not helpless or hopeless. Yeah, he was. And the only one that, even aro revolution against you. Just let's take a look at this. Yeah. See this guy this viral video by Dr.

Richard Bartlett who claims to have the silver bullet treatment for Corona virus using inhaled steroids to function. That simply, isn't true. That's simply false. He's found this treatment that's right in front of our eyes, we're a common medication that nobody knows about. I just have to laugh. It's a treatment for COVID-19. But others in the medical community aren't convinced it's what it's cracked up to be.

There is no silver bullet at the moment and there might never be. There is no silver bullet response to the virus at the moment and there might never be. You're hearing things about things that are just so stupid to be true. There's no scientific proof. He claims inhaled steroids are the cure for COVID-19. And I wish it was as simple as that. The CDC also says

there is no known cure for COVID-19. So we can verify that claim is false. People who are thinking about maybe getting some off label use of Udessa and I that you not do that. We can't tell you that that's going to help you. And there's even a possibility that if you use these steroids too early or too much of them, you should get harm yourself. There

are people that are believed that Udessa and I and taking zinc is working. Is there any downside to doing? You know, there's a placebo effect to make you feel better, unless I just put in reality, but it doesn't have any effect. And to think that that simple medication is the cure that could have saved half a million people. I watched that and I just think I'm

glad they were on camera. We'll never forget how ridiculous those statements are. Brand new study just came out. I think it was four weeks ago. Once again, looking at Udessa and I had an influx of oxygen. Here we go. Oral influx of oxygen with inhaled Udessa and I had treatment of early onset COVID-19 or randomized trial. Also found the proportion of patients of gerund emergency setting

for COVID-19 for more than six hours or hospitalized due to COVID-19 was lower in the treatment group than the placebo group. And so it continues to go on 80% 90% reduction, especially if you used early and what was so shocking about this whole thing. And we talked about in the middle of it, we're here now looking back in our rearview mirror. Was this idea that there

was no early treatment? Don't treat them early. Send them home. Wait till they're blue. Their lips are turning blue. Now, they're, you know, so now this study is saying it's the hospitals that killed people, right? So they sent you away. When you got here, then they threw you on a ventilator, usually remdesivir. And then I think nine out of 10 deaths. And what I wanted to

ask you is what was the protocol? Because I mean, looking back now, it seems to me we denied people just getting regular oxygen. They chemically paralyzed them where they cannot breathe, even if they are in distress and they feel that their oxygen's going low, they are paralyzed. They are helpless trapped. And then you put them on a ventilator. Ventilator associated pneumonia is a whole nother level

of risk of death of pneumonia. Once you put them on a ventilator. So even if you take COVID out of the equation, there's this known risk to ventilator. Many risks with ventilators. And we saw every one of those, including, when they would increase the pressure. If you put someone on a ventilator, you have a risk of popping their lung, a pneumothorax, where you're going to cause

attention pneumothorax, where it presses the heart over to the side, and pairs the return of the blood to the heart and kills you quick if you don't treat it immediately. They call the attention pneumothorax. There's a list of known risks that you have just set them up for by putting them on a ventilator. And I can tell you as a doctor that has been in the

middle of all this, that there have been doctors that have oversold ventilators telling patients, you look tired. That's not an indication to put someone on a ventilator saying, you look tired. You want to rest. Let us put you on the ventilator and you can rest for a while. That was insanity. That was non-science. That was dangerous. It was deadly for many people. Well, I'm even Kyle

Sidel went on to say in the longer version of video, I am talking to people. I've never before taken people that are talking to me and said, well, your oxygen levels low. He's like, usually when we're venting someone and putting them in a coma, they're already in massive distress. Usually aren't speaking to us, not breathing. This is staring people in the eyes and basically walking to

the bed. That would be the last bed they ever laid into. 50 years of medical common sense, good judgment that has been tried and true. Got thrown out the window January 1, 2020, Dell all the way to even what in my hometown where the emergency room, a level two trauma center was putting bags over people's heads. They came in the ER and tested positive for COVID.

So that they, so that they wouldn't spread it to the workers to protect the workers. Non-science, hard to believe these things were happening, but there was no good reason for putting people on ventilators early. What do you think of this study? I know you took a look at it. I mean, they're basically saying that this whole idea, there's a cytokine storm that using sort of AI

and computer learning studying all these records. Here's the study we have it here. Machine learning links, resolving secondary pneumonia to mortality and patients with severe pneumonia, including COVID-19. When we look at this, this idea that it was really this venting, the secondary pneumonia that killed more people than the COVID, what are your thoughts on that? Does that make sense to you? Yes. And so the paper

that I published very early that you covered said we need to give a protocol that's not just but desanide, which will decrease, will shut down the release of the cytokines after every treatment. But also, Clorithromycin, an antibiotic that has been proven to cover and protect from Michael Plasnumonia and all the walking pneumonia that don't have a classic cell wall. Is that similar because they know like

there's a linko protocol, DDSRU. We talked a lot about that. It was hydroxychloroquine zinc and azithromycin. Is it a similar one? It's a similar one and it's going to be just as effective against the walking pneumonia. But research proved before COVID that Clorithromycin had a higher coverage, would protect at least 86% of the people from walking from encapsulated strep pneumonia, which is what you need to

cover people for. And azithromycin was sometimes only 78%. I like 100% success. So I'm going to go with what's most likely to bring success the first time. And Clorithromycin was the choice. Right. And that's what that's actually what we got. And we sent over the package we were supposed to be using. So then there's another part of this study that says that this cytokine storm idea.

They're saying there really wasn't a cytokine storm associated with COVID-19. And when I called you, you pushed back on that a little bit. Absolutely. There was a cytos. Definitely a cytokine storm. That's a common pathway for inflammation in the lungs is for these inflammatory chemicals called cytokines to be released. Interestingly, the research was already done almost a decade before showing buidesinides suppress the release of every

one of those that is involved in COVID, which includes tumor necrosis factor, interleukin 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 11, 13, cyclone oxygenase, thromboxane that increases clotting. Every one of those was shut down with buidesinides. So there is a cytokine storm. That was what led to a primary viral pneumonia. And they could lead to a secondary bacterial pneumonia. If you take care of it, 90% of the

people wouldn't have ever gone to the hospital or the ER. They wouldn't have gotten bacteria in the pneumonia because it never would have progressed. But then we were also giving Clorithromycin, which would take care of the people that were at risk of getting bacterial pneumonia or hadarly bacterial pneumonia. You have a great video of a guy that ends up in the hospital. And obviously, the saying,

no, you're not allowed to be decennied. He fights his way through that. This is awesome. Everybody take a look at this. We have a hard time finishing what he ate. Drinking a little. Drinking. Good for, good point. So they say that. Three days of the treatment. Three days. I'm a shock. Of what I am today, a world was three days ago just with this treatment. But

the buck percent will not work. It will not work. Praise God. Thank you. Good morning. Good morning. I remember that shocked me, that really hit me because I think prior to talking to you in the middle of it, I was under the impression that this COVID thing was really... that it wasn't a fake epidemic necessarily, but it was really being overblown. It seemed like it was

in this tiny group of elderly. And I wasn't even sure it really existed, but you sort of set me straight. You said, Dell, no, this thing has to be taken very seriously. It is not on everybody, but the people that are being affected by it are having a really bad time and you yourself had a pretty bad about. Yeah. And so, you know, I would run

a seven-minute mile on the treadmill, no medicines, no preexisting conditions. And I found out it was a killer firsthand when I could not walk across the... down the sidewalk in front of my house to the end without stopping. I knew I was in trouble. And so the protocol worked, but absolutely is a bio-weapon. Absolutely it was not natural. We had CDC director Redfield a month ago

talk to the Congress and he explained why it was... the evidence that it was manipulated, that the research was published by the Wuhan lab on how to alter it genetically and create this disease. So there's no confusion. This is not a normal virus. And so fortunately COVID's over, but we can learn from the lesson number one, Dell, people need to listen to the right voices. And

if there is a source that has purposely misled people and has changed their narrative over and over and over again, they need to stop listening to those channels. And they need to listen to those that have sought out the truth and have not changed their tune, which is the high wire. And so I appreciate what you've done. Well, I mean, look, we have watched, we've shown

the videos on this show of Willinsky, who just resigned finally. Not a moment too soon, I would say. I don't think she's to blame. She was just a puppet for an entire system that was lying. And we can argue over what the full agenda was. Clearly a needle in every arm in the world using this moment to get us all to be injecting whatever latest hottest

vaccine is out there. And I think that failed. That was the agenda, massive failure. We now see vaccine resistance at the highest level probably since the introduction. And I think that's the question of a vaccine back in, you know, polio or smallpox. When we look at this, when you look at Willinsky and you look at what was being said, the amount of time she had to

correct herself. And yet you've never had to correct yourself. We really haven't had to correct anything. I'm so proud of how the things we've said together and apart has aged is anyone. I mean, your hospital system that you held on to your job and is anyone coming said, Hey, you know, sorry. We were so hard to do. You know, you know, you know, you know, you

know, job saving patients than anyone else around here. Dela, I haven't received any apologies, but I've had a lot of people call me and thank me. And, you know, Fauci did not do a retraction on possibly the most dangerous misinformation that has ever been spoken on the planet. When he shut down a treatment that would have prevented at least 90% of hospitalizations. Remember the hospitals were

overflowing and they had hospitals that were illegal. I mean, again, I mean, my perspective, I was like, I've tried to, it seemed to me that hospitals were shutting down because if you didn't have a ventilator next to a bed, you weren't allowed to use that bed. They weren't using regular, you know, oxygen. There was a point where the hospitals were overflowing, but it could have all

been prevented. And who was in charge of the direction? Who was the White House expert? Right. And he's the guy who said that it was just a placebo. And so that was just one tool that by itself led to countless deaths. Yeah. And I was doing this, and so people should be careful to weigh everything out, think on their own, not just swallow anything that's spoken

by a quote authority figure. I mean, the CDC was saying for monkey pox to wear a mask, they still are on their website. Dela, is it a respiratory virus? No, it is not. Right. And so just because something said by an authority doesn't mean that you have to believe it and blindly believe it. Zezelinco was a friend of mine, and he said, blind faith only belongs

to God. I think that's a healthy thing to live by, to weigh things out, and to use your brain, and to not just believe it because it's the common narrative. Do you have any concerns? I talk about it. I'm worried that... You know, we keep... I mean, here's what I've learned. Here's who I have learned to trust. I have actually learned to trust, you know, Bill

Gates, the World Economic Forum, these people, when they tell me that I'm going to be under attack soon. When they say this is just a rehearsal, that there's an even worse virus coming. These things are... They've actually said, we need to prepare for the next one. The next one could be really big. I've learned to take their word for it. Do you think we should be

taking the word for it? Should we be thinking that there's another virus around the corner? Yes. I am certain that when they promise us future pandemics, that they are... I mean, they've told us the pandemics. We had Redfield say it's going to be a weaponized bird flu that kills 10 to 15%. We've had Bill Gates say that there's going to be smallpox. There's going to be...

Just to see that perspective. Yes. COVID is 0.35% I think is the ultimate death rate now when we look at it. So that would be... Yes, that's why Redfield said... The words that he used... COVID is just a wake-up call. The great... He used the word great pandemic will be a bird flu. The great pandemic is coming. It's going to be a bird flu pandemic. And

so... Have we seen a bird flu wipe out huge populations before? Never. How could that be? I think we've learned a lot. All the world has learned about gain of function research. We've seen them bragging that a Boston University has created a COVID strain that can kill 80%. We've seen South Korea's CDC bragging that they have a COVID strain that they've created that could kill 80%.

In nature, we have never had to deal with these things before. But when they say certain things, when... I don't think we... We need to not take it idly. I think they should be investigated when they're saying things so with such certainty. We've got a glimpse into... None of us were really in the White House, but Peter Navarro was. He was standing there right with... Donald

Trump and all this hit. He was in an interview recently and really kind of laid out when he was calling bold crap to all this very early on. Take leave this. I walk in there. I don't know any of these people from outside the White House. Right? So who's... Who's that Redfield from CDC and Fauci from NIH? Right? Those were the two big players. I go

in there. And within six minutes, I'm in a shouting match with that son of a bitch. And all he keeps saying is... With Fauci. With Fauci. I don't know who he is. Literally. I know who Fauci is. I didn't know who he was. Didn't know he walked on water. Wow. Didn't know he killed tens of thousands of people during the AIDS epidemic and got away with...

That's another story. Don't know who he is. But you know, it's like... It's like somebody walks in here and sits down here. You don't know who he is and you start an interview. What do you do? You take their measure. And my measure of Fauci was... This dude thinks he's a whole lot smarter than he is and he's an arrogant son of a bitch. This is

within the first six minutes. Six minutes. Sounds like Antonio Brown interview. And you know, one of the things I'm good at is taking to measure people pretty quick. Boss is good at that too. Trump. And I'm thinking what... And so I fight with this guy. Mulvaney, I'm fighting with him. So, what I feel comes in and supports Fauci and we leave that meeting with Mulvaney tries

to say, all right, we have a consensus. We're against the trail, but I said, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. There's no consensus in this room. And Pondger finally says something, he's a national security council. And what I do that night, as I go home and I write a memo that I'm gonna

plaster to the entire task force and broad chain that says, that if we don't do this, if we don't do this, this virus is capable of killing half a million Americans and cost in us trillions of dollars, January 28, 2020. And that was, that's about as the best memo I'd probably ever written, because it was spot on. And here's the punch line. Fauci, when he was

sitting there, that SOB knew for a fact that that virus came from the Wuhan lab. He knew that because he had funded the gain of function research in that lab. And he had already begun to design a cover-up. And we know that from the emails he sent to a group of researchers, academics, trying to get their support to push that come from nature theory. And that's

the biggest lie of omission in American history. Because if he had simply owned up to the fact that that thing came from the lab, we could have pressured the Chinese to give us the genome sequence, which would have allowed us to design an effective vaccine rather than the crap we wound up getting. And again, Trump got lied to about that, not just by Fauci, but by

Pfizer, the drug company. And what would? They didn't disclose. The side effects of that. And they weren't clear with him. They made him think that it was a true vaccine when it's not. It's a lot to unpack there, actually. And you know, I'm not sure that a vaccine was ever going to be the answer. But as he's pointed out, this has had horrific side effects. We

all waited a year. Didn't treat anybody no early treatments. Million over a million have died. You know, waiting for that save year, the vaccine, which didn't do a job, didn't stop the pandemic, seemed to have no effect on the death rates, the infection rates whatsoever. And I think that's proved out really perfectly in New Zealand and Australia. Safe and effective. Yeah. Two perfect examples that didn't

have the virus yet got vaccinated first, opened up their gates. And they have some of the highest death rates from COVID we see in the world. So the whole thing really stinks, but this gain of function. I mean, this week, Peter Dasack is skipping and dancing in front of the world because eco health alliance is being given another contract to do more of this lab work

that is was he was involved with it? Wuhan, we're seeing headlines, middle of a war in Sudan. And oh, there's just happens to be a bio weapons lab there. Oh, and in the middle of UK, like wherever there's a war, there's apparently some bio labs at some, you know, dark forces kicking in the doors of warlords. And so when we think about the future, I mean,

we got to, I'm not into this whole disease panic thing, but it just feels like the morons have got the whole of the steering wheel right now. It does feel that way. And you know, he mentioned that Fauci and Pfizer lied to Trump. They lied to everyone. Yeah. And it left a trail of tears death and destruction. And so we need leadership. And we need advisors

that actually are going to have the people's best interest at heart. Yeah. Not corporations is the best interest at heart. Yeah. We've seen that that's played out. Who bet, you know, I guess there were benefits to the COVID shot. I'm just going to say that $38 billion in 2020. 22 for Pfizer, right? $18.5 billion for Madonna in 2022 alone. I don't consider that how much is

a human life worth though? Yeah. And so yeah, the fact that gain a function research is happening, when we had a moratorium against it, because it was too dangerous. What's going on here? I mean, it got outsourced from the United States to Wuhan. And honestly, what good is it done? I mean, with all, let's, let's say that, what can we say? We didn't escape in the

lab. We weren't prepared. Apparently, we were studying the coronavirus. That's why we're doing the gain a function. We finally get one. And your vaccine is a totally useless pile of crap. So in the end, even if gain a function had a value, you just prove to have no value. You knew nothing. You didn't help you. Your understanding. Didn't matter how many people were in labs looking

at it in the Sudan and North Carolina and Wuhan and Ukraine. They're all stared at the thing. But the moment's one of them gets out, they're like, I don't know what to do. It doesn't make any sense to me. But I do know, here's what I do know. You should, you steroids like we do all the time. Definitely don't give anybody any antibiotics. Make sure they

avoid things like hypermectom, hydroxychloroquine that seemed to work in every study we did 10 years ago. Let's make sure we avoid all of those things. Which just in the end, it gets harder and harder to not think that there are, you know, strings being pulled that are not being designed for the good of humanity. And certainly not the good of the United States of America. Agreed.

Well said. You know, you think about, I said this July of 2020 in an interview that went viral. I said, you're not going to make a one time one shot vaccine for a rapidly mutating respiratory virus. We have the evidence of that for 40 years where they tried to do that with the flu. And so, you know, three years later, we see that it wasn't a

one time one shot. And actually, fouls you said many times he was planning on everybody getting a shot every year till they die. Yeah, that was the end point. I'm amazed at the even say every year because still for a long time, it's been like two years and we're on number five. So it looks like two year at least two to three a year. And that's

doing nothing. One, we're seeing negative efficacy. We're seeing the more these vaccines you get, we see this, you know, coming out of Cleveland Clinic, you know, amongst doctors and nurses, the more they got the vaccine, the more likely they were to be infected. So the things that total disaster. The Pfizer data that we received from the FDA after the Freedom of Information Act request that had

to go to court because they did not want to release a dose of that for 75 years. The very first drop of data showed 1200 adverse events, bad outcomes associated with their product. According to Pfizer, they made the list in the middle of it, Dell. It had Kaposi, Sarcoma AIDS Cancer. Can you think of any medicine or product that has ever had that as a risk?

It also had dozens of autoimmune disorders. And this was a list made by Pfizer about their product. And they knew about it. They had myocarditis on the list and they didn't list that. I'm an ER doctor that works many times at a heart hospital, Dell. Guess what I take care of? Heart problems. People who come in with chest pain, heart attack, sometimes they're in distress. We

do many tests, but there's one test, the Traponin test, a blood test that looks for heart cells dying. You have to have living heart cells that have Traponin in it, die, burst, spill into the bloodstream and we catch it on the blood test at the right time. A study just came out of University of Basel. Switzerland saying 2.8% of patients that had the shots that they

studied had elevated Traponin, meaning heart cells died. What heart cells do you want to die? Right. And does everybody have chest pain that has heart damage? No. Many people can have silent heart attacks. And so, and not everybody's going to realize that they have a problem if they have a little discomfort or shortness of breath after a treatment that has a risk almost 3% having heart

cells die. And that's just one of the side effects. That's just starting to add in all the other side effects, blood clots, heart attacks, stroke, all these things. Cancer. So I want to thank you for taking the time to come up here. Let me sort of ask you what would be a guess. The Doomsday, you know, a million dollar question, which is if you are concerned,

which I know you are of something else escaping from a lab or something out there, what's at the top of your list? What are the things in, you know, are there any ways that the doctors we're preparing for the test? You know, Dell, my message on that very first interview that went viral and triggered you reaching out to me. I said, we're not helpless or hopeless.

We have never been. Yeah. That's been the message. We were told to hide in place and just wait for a man to lay out. It'll never be a cure. None of these drugs will ever work. And who told us that, by the way, it was Fauci who led an effort to try to make a HIV vaccine for 30 years and has failed over and over and

over. He's a serial failure in vaccines. But I am convinced there will be other pandemics. They've told us that. I know what they are that they've listed. And there are treatments already available. There's actually things that have been studied by our own government against smallpox, for instance, that have been proven to be effective. Yes, there's a study that shows NTZ, an anti-paracetic. They... Another anti-paracetic. That

they used and they saw some benefit. And there's reports that the Native Americans used, like the purple picture plant and had some success against smallpox, for instance. But if it's something like CDC Director Redfield called out, which is a weaponized bird flu, guess what the common pathway is for disease. It would be a cytokine storm from... Poisons released from the lung lining. We already have a

tool that has already been proven in the COVID pandemic to be effective. But you're dead and died. We'll shut down the cytokines. We have tools. There's other things when the time comes. But people should not, first of all, the term fear porn. That came out of the COVID pandemic. And they earned it. And so we don't need to be paralyzed in fear, which was what we

were told to do. Stay at home, hide in place. And listen to the right voices and don't listen to the loudest voices that have been wrong over and over again. My wire has been a lifeline for many people. They heard the truth over and over again. And I applaud you for what you've done so far. Well, look, I mean, all we were doing is what the

scientific method should have demanded, which was allowing every voice to the table. We were hearing plenty of those. There was saying none of these products work. And I was like, well, let's listen to the ones that are saying it works and why. Why is this not an open discussion? And by the way, when I start seeing censorship of great doctors, they're standing next to patients saying

this doctor saved my life. And all of a sudden, the LinkedIn disappears. The YouTube video goes down. I think we should all. If I had one lesson, if you start seeing a scientific, you know, an established doctor that is speaking truth being censored, I would go ahead and try and figure out what that person was trying to say. I think we now know that that censorship

is probably the badge of courage. And we should be taking that very seriously. You know, I had this debate with Neil deGrasse Tyson who tried to say, you followed consensus. But science is not consensus. Science is about the scientific method. We should be hearing all people at the table. And now all the people that are at this table are the ones that proved to be right.

You are one of them. And I hope you get some moments of a bit of a personal dance in your backyard for, you know, really having called this and your ability to say I told you so, I think is off the charts. Well, thank you. Yeah, you know, the scientific fact is reproducible and observable. It's not negotiable. It's not a majority of hands going up and

deciding this is the thing. That's not science. Yeah. And so thank you for what you've done. And we'll be here. I'm going to be in the ER a lot. I hope are wrong. I hope that we'd never see anything like this happen. If it happens, we won't be paralyzed and fear. Okay. We know what to do. Yes. I know the first call I'm going to make.

Dr. Bartlett is such a pleasure. No need to think about that. Thank you. Don't join us. Well, you know, the biggest tool used against us really wasn't Tony Fauci. It was the legend. The legacy media that gave him a voice that said that is the only voice you're going to be allowed to hear. Luckily, the Internet allowed us to create the high wire. Now one of

the biggest stars of legacy media has been kicked out. Yes, where he's going. Hey, it's Tucker Carlson. You often hear people say the news is full of lies. But most of the time, that's not exactly right. Much of what you see on television or read the New York Times is in fact true in the literal sense. It could pass one of the media's own. Lawyer's would

be willing to sign off on it. In fact, they may have. But that doesn't make it true. It's not true. At the most basic level, the news you consume is a lie. A lie of the stealthiest and most insidious kind. Facts have been withheld on purpose along with proportion and perspective. You are being manipulated. How does that work? Let's see. If I tell you that a

man has been unjustly arrested for armed robbery that is not strictly speaking a lie, he may have been framed. But if I don't mention the fact that the same man has been arrested for the same crime six times before, am I really informing you? No, I'm not. I'm misleading you. And that's what the news media are doing in every story that matters every day of the

week, every week of the year. What's it like to work in a system like that? After more than 30 years in the middle of it, we could tell you stories. The best you can hope for in the news business at this point is the freedom to tell the fullest truth that you can. But there are always limits. And you know that if you bump up against

those limits often enough, you will be fired for it. That's not a guess. It's guaranteed. Every person who works in English language media understands that. The rule of what you can't say defines everything. It's filthy, really, and it's utterly corrupting. You can't have a free society if people aren't allowed to say what they think is true. Speech is the fundamental prerequisite for democracy. That's why it's

enshrined in the first of our constitutional amendments. Amazingly, as it tonight, there aren't many platforms left that allow free speech. The last big one remaining in the world, the only one is Twitter, where we are now. Twitter has long served as the place where our national conversation incubates and develops. Twitter is not a partisan site. Everybody's allowed here. And we think that's a good thing. And

yet for the most part, the news that you see analyzed on Twitter comes from media organizations that are themselves thinly disguised propaganda outlets. You see it on cable news, you talk about it on Twitter. The result may feel like a debate, but actually the gatekeepers are still in charge. We think that's a bad system. We know exactly how it works and we're sick of it. Starting

soon will be bringing a new version of the show we've been doing for the last six and a half years to Twitter. We bring some other things to it. But for now, we're just grateful to be here. Free speech is the main right that you have. Without it, you have no others. See you soon. Part of this movement, a part of making change or watching the

highway. I just want to thank you. I thank you for staying engaged. Thanks for sharing the work that we do. Things like spellers, the way that you have, so that it really makes it possible. The truth is just us by ourselves to have all the censorship that's out there, we would never be where we're at now except that you did what you were guided to do.

Something I keep telling everybody. When you come up and say, what is it I'm supposed to do? Well, one thing I know that you have been doing is you've been saying, you know what? This is very important information. I'm going to share with my friends. Even if I'm people are like saying, well, you know, he spreads misinformation. Just watch it. We just watch it. I just

check it out and want you to see what you're talking about. You have made this possible. It's little tiny things like that that may not seem like a lot to you. It was just one little sharing of a video, but it goes on to make us say that 11 million people have their lives changed and we're shifting the consciousness around autism and what these children can

do in the world. It's that simple. I think we all too often stand like deer in the headlights at the enormity of what it looks like we're up against. And I think maybe I'm just wired a little bit differently. I've been thinking about this a lot lately that people like, oh, you're so courageous in all those things, but it's really, it really comes down to one

thing for me. What is the thing? Very next step I need to take. I don't look at this giant monolithic thing that we could all be against. I mean, we bring this stuff on television. But what I do know is that if I keep taking the next obvious step, the next right step, I am confident that the millions and billions of us that are standing together,

if we all make those steps in the directions we're being guided to go, we all end up at the finish line. And that finish line is the great awakening. That is how we do this. Don't be in awe of what we're up against. Be in awe of the moment you're living in. This is something that Mickey share. Make sure that you go to plan demik3.com and

sign up to watch this movie. But what Mickey's talking about, it's in awe of the moment. Be in awe of your children. Be in awe of that flower. Start breathing in and in again, taking it in again. And when you look at the problems of the world, don't look at how big they are, how far away they are. Maybe only a president changes it. Just take

your next step. And if you do that and commit to that, I assure you the world will be ours. I'll see you next week. I'm the high wire. Yeah.