Source: Russell Brand
They Could LOCK You In Your Homes!
Jun 8, 2023 · 17m 52s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SdWhtU8mYc
remember that conspiracy theory that the who would be able to close borders and enforce vaccine passports is actually going to happen so is it worth knowing who funds the who I'd say so hello there you 6.4 million Awakening wonders thanks for joining me on this Voyage to truth and freedom together we will awaken together we will return to an original state where we will be able
to discern truth from fiction where we will be able to engage in discourse turn on the notification Bell right now and subscribe to our channel the algorithm of course wants you dumb and distracted filled with mind-numbing mainstream media mush but we want you vivacious and awake that's why we are talking today about the who's new proposal that they have the ability to impose on your country
wherever you are in the world because it's the World Health Organization the World Health Organization wants to be able to impose certain restrictions so how do the World Health Organization even get their money and their legitimacy I don't remember voting for them I don't remember being asked if I wanted a World Health Organization well apparently we've got one oh that's all very lovely for you so
who funds them what are their intentions I mean presumably part of it is really helping people and providing medicines but one way of what working out what the intention of an organization is is looking at where they get their money from under the assumption that people won't give them money if that organization is not going to be advantageous to the economic ends preferred by the donor
that's a fair assumption right let me know in the chat and the comments so firstly we'll talk about the who and where they get their money then we'll talk about the legitimacy of this new proposal that they're able to impose on your country and therefore you regulations that you didn't vote for let's have a listen to Margaret Chan former director of The Who explaining how it's
funded you asked an excellent question if I tell you that picture as an organization only 30 percent of my budget is predictable funds I mean how far in this video we're going to get without saying it's Bill Gates in the age of Bill Gates who's going to turn up his knee with some money but let's let Margaret Chan have a moment other 70 I have to
take a head and go around the world to beg for money dignified a hat begging around the world anyone got a few quid anyone got a few dollars anyone got an agenda and when they give us the money they are highly linked to their preferences okay here's some money and I've also got some preferences that's how we've always understood the relationships between organizations like the who
various National governments and the corporate world to be but money is funneled in expectations are funneled out right let me know in the chat so who's top of the list of donors Germany who's second the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation alone is responsible for 88 of the total amount donated by philanthropic foundations to the who over the years the billionaire philanthropists are we still calling them
billionaire philanthropism like I'm philanthropist they're just doing stuff because their love of mankind or humankind right over the years the billionaire philanthropists have become the who second biggest donor making the health agency heavily dependent on their support to keep functioning as Margaret Chan said they have to go around with their hat out and these people have preferences I wonder what the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation's
preference is global Health experts say that while this money is welcome it gives the gates an outsized influence and underscores The Chronic funding problem The Who faces even as it contends with more and more Health crises over eight percent of the who's funding relies on voluntary contributions meaning any amount of money given freely by donors whether member states ngos philanthropic organizations or other private entities the
voluntary contributions are typically earmarked for specific projects or diseases meaning the who cannot freely decide how to use them I mean that means their whole legitimacy or at least 80 of the legitimacy of the organization is up for question eighty percent of their funding comes from people or organizations as it just listed that say you can have this money if you agree to dot dot dot
and we can all fill that in depending on how much we've educated ourselves of the events over the last couple of years the involvement of the pharmaceutical industry in various Health crises not just the obvious one for the last few years but the continent of Africa has had all sorts of peculiar stuff inflicted upon it as well as the nation of India this is an ongoing
problem that merely became concentrated and some would say more visible and perhaps even relevant during the pandemic affected everybody in ways that became observable if not reliable the who has had to do the bidding of Rich donors not only Rich nations in Europe and North America but also Rich philanthropies such as the Gates Foundation said Global health expert Lawrence Gustin Kelly lee a professor of Public
Health at Simon Fraser University who authored a book about the who said the sheer size of the funds from the Gates Foundation compromises the who's Independence whether it's political parties being funded by the donations of Corporations and billionaires or the who being funded by billionaires and corporations and philanthropic organizations that many people say are about tax breaks actually in influence and power shows you that these
organizations have such particular relationships with powerful economic entities that democracy itself becomes Irrelevant for example have you been offered the opportunity to vote on whether or not your country follows the edicts over the who if you use this platform YouTube did you know that YouTube and Google accept the who's regulations and recommendations when it comes to the things that can be he said on this platform
that's not no power at all that's the power of censorship influence it transcends who has more power Google and the who or you and your vote um which one of these basically the same individuals shallots yeah Google he who pays the Piper plays the tune as the old saying goes she said nice there are important questions to be raised about good governance including the accountability representativeness
and legitimacy of having a single Foundation be so influential the current system is frankly undemocratic and yet democracy is the word that people continually use when reifying our civilizations particularly in contrast with some of the civilizations that we should be bombing or attacking or otherwise destabilizing and usurping and replacing so let's have a look at the who's current agenda to impose a treaty that would mean
that you would have no control over whether your borders were locked down certain medications might be made mandatory or the carrying of passports this is from British newspaper lockdown measures could be imposed on the UK by the World Health Organization during a few pandemic under sweeping new powers member states would be obliged to follow the agency's instructions when responding to pandemics including by introducing vaccine passports
border closures and quarantine measures under a draft update to its regulations now we have to go around the world as well with our handout begging for money from all sorts of people mostly though they're pretty legit and this one is going to be fun and enjoyable stay to the end I'll make it funny I'll put little jokes in there stay with us stay with us for
this little attitude in a moment Harvard Health review research why people take supplements the top response was hope they hope these poor bastards them in and mineral supplements will help overcome a lifetime of poor diet and exercise and they hope they might offset family health issues there is little evidence that the vitamin and mineral supplements we take are anything more than Placebo from 22 clinical trials
comparing multivitamins to Placebo the health of the multivitamin group was no better than the placebo group five servings of fruit and five servings of vegetables per day is linked to lower mortality lower cases of cancer reduced risk of high blood pressure osteoporosis cardiovascular disease and respiratory disease filter greens provides a full spectrum of the essential vegetables and fruits our bodies need for proper nutrition fill the
greens is an organic superfood it's the whole fruit and the whole vegetable all in there every little bit of it fielded greens is the only fruits and vegetable brand backed by a better health promise field of Green's promises you'll feel healthier fast but the creative proof comes during your next physical when your doctor checks your lab results and go hey baby I don't know what you're
doing but keep it up let me get you started with 15 off your first order plus free fast shipping visit brickhouserussell.com and use promo code brand that's Brickhouse russell.com promo code brand a new pandemic treaty under discussion would also Force Britain to spend five percent of its Health Budget on preparing for another virus outbreak I wonder if you fund something whether it's more or less likely
to happen let me know in the chat let me know in the comments some ministers are understood to be alarmed by plans to increase the who's Powers enabling its governing body to require countries to hand over the recipe of vaccines regardless of intellectual property rights and to counter misinformation do you notice that increasingly we have been invited to not trust one another to loathe one another
to engage continually in conflagration to believe that people are sort of stupid and ugly and untrustworthy and that there is a Cadre of experts a technocratic level of government that we should all be yielding to if you believe in yourself your ability to run your own life to run your own Community to make your own decisions why would you participate in the funding of an organization
that clearly has strong relationships with corporate interests that require a profit that they can get by imposing certain regular why would we even participate in systems like that let me know in the chat in the comments and notice that there's a dimension to this that's about social dynamics about spirituality about personal Awakening about the necessity to have a population that is ridden with fear and doubt
and alert to conflict and totally mistrustful of other people if you felt that you could trust yourself if you felt that you could trust other people if you felt that you could run your own life in your own Community why would you need these organizations and of course I know that who have participated in I imagine all sorts of beneficial programs that have alleviated all sorts
of tensions and in fact if you're going to have a global body it should be funded very responsibly and it should be Democratic these are just the sort of things that people say aren't they I'm suggesting that we do them MPS have written to ministers to warn of an ambition evident for The Who to transition from an advisory organization to a controlling International Authority that's very
interesting that many bureaucratic organizations on the basis of their expertise are moving into positions of domination where they're able to bypass democracy The Who though is not from God or the sea or nature or a philosopher it is funded as we just saw Margaret Chan Say by corporate entities they go with their handout and they I say to them what do you want us to do
that is a bad model would you agree don't you want to decide for yourself have you been watching what's going on have you noticed the undue influence of these Global corporations have you noticed the ineptitude of your government have you noticed that these two entities are ideologically interlocked have you seen that let me know in the chat in their letter seen by the telegraph they urge
the foreign office to block powers that appear to intrude materially into the UK's ability to make its own rules and control its own budgets you can see why there's a rise in nationalism when things like this are happening but nationalism to some degree is a response to feeling invaded my personal beliefs is that these decisions should have nothing to do with racial religious gender or sexual
identity but the idea that power is elsewhere and being imposed on you should be rejected by every independent-minded community-oriented individual on our planet the rule changes have been proposed as part of plans to update the who's International Health regulations in light of the coronavirus pandemic and establish a new pandemic preparedness treaty one of the things that troubled me most about the pandemic period was the lack
of communication transparency the surveillance the censorship the opportunism and the ineptitude of many of the bodies organizations and individuals that are in positions of power how do you feel about granting more power to those interests let me know the treaty was first proposed by world leaders including Boris Johnson in 2021 during the pandemic and was originally designed to improve alert systems data sharing and the production
of vaccines to Foster an all of government and all of society approach yeah that sounds terrifying and the people involved are people like Boris Johnson which is the last thing any of us want even Boris Johnson doesn't trust Boris Johnson but among 300 proposed amendments to the ihrs are changes to make the who's advice binding and you can't have binding advice hey I got some advice
for you you know maybe you should look out for someone who's more suitable for you oh yeah I might do I don't know it depends that's binding oh okay advice shouldn't be be binding okay we're just thinking of rounding up this demographic and this demographic based on our personal preferences oh no that doesn't seem fair we think everyone should be able to get along and make
our own choices binding and introduce new requirements for countries to recognize it as the global Authority on public health measures sounds like an egomaniac I'd like you to recognize me as a global Authority on public health measures well we'll base that on your Effectiveness actually and also how are you funded shut up to mind your own business I got some advice for you you better [__]
off well I think I'm gonna stop binding the plan would require member countries to recognize the who as the guidance and coordinating authority of international Public Health response and undertake to follow the who's recommendations in their International Public Health response if passed the change would mean the who could enforce border closures quarantine measures and vaccine passports on all member countries including the UK so that means
they've got the right to lock you up in your house let me just have a look before we sign this treaty what does it entire to do oh nothing really just close your borders what so no one could come in or out and also quarantine measures so we'd have to stay in our house and vaccine passports so everyone would have to listen let me give you
some advice just do what we [__] say well actually finding for using bureaucracy and health and safety to legitimize new forms of tyranny that are presenting themselves as all kind of friendly and here to help and if you attack them they say you're a conspiracy theorist or have got some atavistic throwback nationalistic ideology that don't belong in today's modern world but actually this is the Tyranny
now always the conversations about despots and despotism use the semiotics and image systems of the most recent examples of tyranny and despotism but it won't be like that plainly in a more technologically advanced version of events in a more media Savvy data oriented tyranny everything will be like a kind of Soft Cell that's what I'm starting to realize they'll be just oh hi do you want
some help with your yeah we've just got to do them before you know it you're locked in your house with a passport and unable to go anywhere well that is despotism yeah but we're doing it for a reason despots always do what they do for a reason a draft of the treaty itself would commit member states to spending five percent of their health budgets plus a
proportion of GDP to pandemic preparedness that's your money Esther McVeigh the former cabinet minister said there is rightly growing concerned about the who's pandemic treaty and international Health regulations the plan to represent a significant shift for the organization from a member-led advisory body to a health authority with powers of compulsion I look like seeing power and compulsion that close together in a sentence you can't go
from a I remember LED here's some advice through compelling power that is like in Star Wars where they're crashed in that thing that is a compelling power you're going to be crushed you don't have any choice one advice becomes binding you're in an interesting territory I would say and I would advise you this isn't binding to resist that you could do that if you want to
because it's just the vice hopefully though the who have a good track record and that this mad egotistical narcissistic demand for Authority is based on on experience it's like LeBron James saying I'll be in charge of basketball because I'm the best at it something like that let's have a look this is particularly worrying when you consider the who's poor track record on providing consistent clear and
scientifically sound advice for managing International disease outbreaks that's like me taking control of basketball they've got a bad track record consistent clear and scientifically said that is totally what I want that is the bare minimum for an organization calling itself the World Health Organization isn't it campaigners also expressed concerns about increasing the who's role in identifying misinformation after its experts dismissed the lab leak covered origin
Theory only to later accept it remains on the table yes it does remain on the table because it's not been wiped down properly like the Wu ad lab itself Molly Kingsley co-founder of the US for them campaign group said we should all be concerned about the who being ordained as an Arbiter of pandemic truth especially given its poor record during the pandemic such as its claim
that kovid was definitely zoonotic in origin and it's April 2020 denial of the role of natural immunity in protecting against infection I wonder if what Margaret Chan said about the way that it's funded and those two errors have any kind of relationship with one another who could ever possibly work that out not you or me we're just stupid people that need unelected corporate funded bodies to
tell us what to do and thank God you're going to have no choice because what would you do with your choice do you just mess it up you're not intelligent enough to make choices for yourself you're not part of the Limitless Oneness that underwrites all reality you're not capable of re-metabolizing yourself into Glory you're not capable of putting your past behind you and moving forward into
a glorious new future based on love pragmatism rationalism democracy sharing overcoming form of prejudices and errors in order to create a better new world based on the technological advances in Spiritual Awakening that we are currently undergo you are all of that was just rhetoric you can do it I believe in you and I do not trust them but that's just what I think let me know
what you think in the comments in the chat and if you enjoy this video have a look over these they're just as good probably I can't remember what that one is that one's good I don't know about that one they're both good they're all good and you can see this every day on Rumble uncensored where we can bring people together in the Spirit of Harmony and
love more important than any of that is that you please stay free
Social actions (Like, Bookmark, Comment, Deeplink) land in Manage phase · Premiuum integration later