More explosive Hunter Biden WhatsApp messages released

ANY LAW FIRM IN AMERICA. THE BIDENS ARE THE BEST I KNOW AT DOING EXACTLY WHAT THE CHAIRMAN WANTS FROM THIS PARTNERSHIP, HE WRITES, THIS AS THE NEW YORK TIMES WAITED UNTIL THE 21 TST PARAGRAPH OF A PIECE TODAY TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE MISHANDLING OF THE HUNTER BIDEN INVESTIGATION. THE NEW YORK POSTED TORE Y'ALL BOARD WRITING THIS, FREEZE HUNTER'S PLEA DEAL UNTIL WE KNOW WHICH PROSECUTORS LIED TO

SAVE HIM. JOINING ME IS TENNESSEE CONGRESSMAN, DAVID KUSTOFF. IT'S GOOD TO SEE YOU. THANKS FOR BEING HERE. YOUR COMMITTEE FOUND ALL OF THIS AND RELEASED THESE WHAT'S APP MESSAGES. CAN YOU TELL US WHAT THE COMMITTEE FOUND? >> YEAH. WELL, FIRST OF AWCIALTION MARIA, THANK YOU -- FIRST OF ALL, MARIA, THANK YOU FOR HAVING ME ON THIS MORNING. THE PLEA AGREEMENT WAS ANNOUNCED TUESDAY OF LAST WEEK.

WE HAD THE HEARING IN THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE TO DECIDE WHETHER TO RELEASE TRANSCRIPTS FROM THE TWO WHISTLEBLOWERS TWO DAYS AFTER THE PLEA AGREEMENT. AND I THINK THAT IF THE NATION KNEW ABOUT THESE TRANSCRIPTS, THE TESTIMONY FROM THE TWO IRS WHISTLEBLOWERS BEFORE THE PLEA AGREEMENT, THE PLEA AGREEMENT NEVER WOULD HAVE BEEN AGREED TO. THAT'S THE FIRST THING. BUT THE STATEMENTS THAT THE WHISTLEBLOWERS MADE, REMEMBER,

THESE WHISTLEBLOWERS, THEIR LIVELIHOOD IS WORKING FOR THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE SO THEY CAME FORWARD AT GREAT PERIL AND GREAT LIABILITY TO THEIR JOBS AND THEIR ABILITY TO PROVIDE FOR THEIR FAMILIES. THEY CAME FORWARD BECAUSE THEY SAW THE MISAPPLICATION OF JUSTICE AND, FRANKLY, A TWO TIERED SYSTEM AS IT RELATES TO THE BIDENS VERSUS ANYBODY ELSE. THE ALLEGATIONS, THE WHAT'S APP MESSAGES THAT YOU JUST SHOWED, THE OTHER

WHAT'S APP MESSAGE, EVERYTHING THAT THE WHISTLEBLOWERS TALKED ABOUT, IF THAT HAD BEEN ANYBODY OTHER THAN HUNTER BIDEN OR JOE BIDEN, STICK ANYBODY'S NAME ON THERE, THEY WOULD HAVE BEEN PROSECUTED TO THE FULLEST EXTENT OF THE LAW. MARIA: THIS IS JUST STUNNING, CONGRESSMAN. IT REALLY IS. AND I DON'T UNDERSTAND HOW THE DOJ CAN EXPLAIN AWAY INVESTIGATING TAX EVASION ON INCOME WITHOUT ACTUALLY INVESTIGATING THE INCOME OF WHERE

THIS MONEY CAME FROM. HE'S ASKING FOR 10 MILLION HERE, 5 MILLION THERE, FOR ALL OF THESE FOREIGN NATIONALS. WHAT WAS -- WHAT WERE THEY PAYING FOR? DID JOE BIDEN MAKE POLICY DECISIONS IN CHINA'S FAVOR TO BE PAID? >> WELL, FIRST OF ALL, CONSIDER HUNTER AND WHATEVER TALENTS AND ABILITIES TO AFFECT HIS FATHER OR AFFECT GOVERNMENT, THEY WERE ESSENTIALLY PAYING FOR INFLUENCE PEDDLING. THAT'S THE BOTTOM LINE

BECAUSE HUNTER BIDEN HAS NO OTHER TALENTS, NO OTHER ABILITIES, OTHER THAN TO TOUCH HIS FATHER AND OTHER PEOPLE WITHIN THE GOVERNMENT. AND WHEN YOU GO THROUGH THE TESTIMONY OF THE TWO WHISTLEBLOWERS AND ONE OF THEM TALKED ABOUT THAT THERE'S AT LEAST $2.2 MILLION IN UNPAID TAXES THAT THEY WERE LOOKING AT, I CAN TELL YOU, ANY U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE IN THE COUNTRY WOULD HAVE BROUGHT SERIOUS TAX

CHARGE AS IT RELATES TO THAT SO IT'S DEEPLY CONCERNING TO ME AS A FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTOR. I THINK IT SHOULD BE OBVIOUSLY VERY CONCERNING TO ANY AMERICANS. WHEN I HAD MY CONSTITUENTS OR PEOPLE THAT COME ON YOUR PROGRAM, EVERYDAY AMERICANS THAT SAY, YOU KNOW, IF IT WERE ME AND THE SAME ALLEGATIONS WERE MADE, I WOULD BE DIFFERENT. THAT'S A REAL CONCERN. MARIA: IT'S A REAL CONCERN.

TODD PIRO, I THINK YOU'VE GOT TWO ISSUES GOING ON HERE. ON THE ONE HAND YOU'VE GOT THE INFLUENCE PEDDLING, THE FACT THAT THE BIDEN FAMILY IS DEEND DEMANDING PEOPLE IN POWER IN CHINA TIED TO THE CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY, THEY'RE DEMANDING MILLIONS OF DOLLARS TO POCKET THE MONEY THEMSELVES. THE OTHER FACT IS THE DOJ SLOW WALKED IT. JASON SMITH WAS WITH ME THE OTHER DAY. HE SAID

TO ME THE BIDEN FAMILY TOOK IN $17 MILLION FROM 2014 TO 2019 BUT THE FBI AND DOJ SAT ON IT AND THEY ALLOWED THE STAT CHUTE OF LIMITATION -- STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS TO BECOME EFFECTIVE. >> ALL ROADS LEAD TO JOE BIDEN. BEFORE THEY GET THERE THEY REALLY HAVE TO GO THROUGH MERRICK GARLAND FIRST. THAT LEADS ME TO WHAT I THINK HAS TO BE THE CULMINATION OF

ALL OF THIS. CONGRESSIONAL HEARING WHERE YOU HAVE MERRICK GARLAND VERSUS THE SPECIAL COUNSEL, DAVID WEISS. ONE OF THEM IS TELLING THE TRUTH. ONE OF THEM IS NOT. IS THAT WHAT YOU ENVISION, CONGRESSMAN? >> WELL, TODD, I'LL TAKE IT A STEP FURTHER BECAUSE GO TO WHISTLEBLOWER ONE'S TRANSCRIPT WHERE HE -- AND THESE TWO WHISTLEBLOWERS TOOK VERY THOROUGH NOTES IN ALL THEIR MEETINGS. WHISTLEBLOWER NUMBER ONE IN HIS

NOTES WROTE DOWN THAT DAVID WEISS, THE U.S. ATTORNEY IN TELL DELAWARE SAID I'M NOT THE DECIDING OFFICIAL ON WHETHER CHARGES ARE FILED. NOW, I'LL REMIND THE AUDIENCE THAT TWO WHISTLEBLOWERS WHO CAME FORWARD, WHEN THEY GAVE THEIR STATEMENTS, THEY HAD TO TESTIFY TRUTHFULLY OR THEY COULD BE PROSECUTED FOR NOT TESTIFYING TRUTHFULLY. YOU'VE GOT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES THAT SAID U.S. ATTORNEY DID HAVE --

SO ONE OF THOSE TWO PEOPLE ARE NOT TELLING THE TRUTH. AND TO YOUR POINT, I BELIEVE RIGHT NOW THAT MERRICK GARLAND IS SET TO TESTIFY BEFORE THE HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE IN SEPTEMBER, MAYBE SEPTEMBER 20th. THE U.S. ATTORNEY DAVID WEISS SHOULD COME FORWARD HOPEFULLY BEFORE THEN AND TESTIFY ABOUT THE WHISTLEBLOWER'S COMMENTS AND WHETHER IN FACT HE ACTUALLY SAID THAT BECAUSE IF HE DID, IF HE DID MAKE

THAT CLAIM, THEN MERRICK GARLAND'S NOT TELLING THE TRUTH. MARIA: WHAT ABOUT THE TESTIMONY OF HUNTER BIDEN? I MEAN, THE COMPUTER SALESMAN IS SUING HIM AND HE'S GOT TO TESTIFY AS WELL, RIGHT, HE'S GOT TO GO INTO A DEPOSITION. >> THAT'S RIGHT. AND YOU KNOW, IF YOU PULL WAY BACK AND I THINKS THIS IS IMPORTANT, THIS PLEA AGREEMENT GOES FORWARD BEFORE DISTRICT COURT JUDGE LATER IN JULY,

MAYBE JULY 26. IF YOU'RE THE JUDGE AND YOU'VE GOT THE GOVERNMENT AND THE DEFENDANT, HUNTER BIDEN, COMING INTO COURT WANTING TO PLEAD GUILTY TO THESE CHARGES AND LIKELY, LIKELY NO PRISON TIME, IF YOU'RE THE JUDGE, I MEAN, THE JUDGE HAS INTERNET. THE JUDGE WATCHES TV. THE JUDGE GETS THE NEWSPAPERS. THE JUDGE SHOULD KNOW ABOUT THESE TRANSCRIPTS. THIS DISTRICT COURT JUDGE COULD SAY, YOU KNOW, BASED ON

WHAT I KNOW, WHAT'S OUT THERE IN THE PUBLIC, I DON'T ACCEPT THE PLEA. MARIA: UH HUH. OKAY. SO THEN THE JUDGE COULD JUST NOT ACCEPT THE PLEA. THEN WHAT HAPPENS? >> THEN THEY'LL HAVE TO GO TO TRIAL AND HOPEFULLY THE GOVERNMENT WOULD GO FORWARD ON THE OTHER ALLEGATIONS THAT BOTH WHISTLEBLOWERS WANTED TO INVESTIGATE BUT WERE REBUFFED BY THEIR TESTIMONY, THE ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY AND OTHER IRS

OFFICIALS. AGAIN, THESE ARE THE REASONS THAT THE TWO WHISTLEBLOWERS CAME FORWARD IN THE VERY FIRST PLACE. MARIA: IT'S JUST STUNNING. A STUNNING STORY, CONGRESSMAN. REAL QUICK BEFORE YOU GO. KEVIN McCARTHY THE OTHER DAY SAID IF THIS IS TRUE, WE WILL START LOOKING AT AN IMPEACHMENT TRIAL, IMPEACHMENT ACTIVITIES FOR MERRICK GARLAND. WHAT IS THE PLAN IN CONGRESS? WHAT IS YOUR ROLE HERE? ARE YOU GOING TO BE

DRAWING UP ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT FOR MERRICK GARLAND, FOR JOE BIDEN, FOR ANY OF THE OTHER PERPETRATORS HERE? >> I THINK YOU'VE GOT TO TAKE IT STEP BY STEP. AND THE FIRST THING IS, WE'VE HEARD FROM THE WHISTLEBLOWERS. THEY'VE MADE THEIR STATEMENTS. WE NEED TO HEAR FROM THE U.S. ATTORNEY, DAVID WEISS. WE NEED TO HEAR FROM THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, MERRICK GAR HAND. BECAUSE AGAIN, -- GARLAND. BECAUSE

AGAIN, EITHER THE WHISTLEBLOWER'S TELLING THE TRUTH OR MERRICK GARLAND IS TELLING THE TRUTH. ONE OR THE OTHER. THE WHISTLEBLOWER CAME FORWARD, GAVE THESE STATEMENTS, AND KNOWS HE COULD BE PROSECUTED FOR NOT TELLING THE TRUTH. MARIA: THANK YOU VE